Rate‐type and integral‐type sectional analysis for time‐dependent response with the <i>fib</i> <scp>Model Code</scp> 2020

Abstract This study examines the time‐dependent behavior of reinforced and prestressed concrete structures using integral‐ and rate‐type formulations, applying the concrete creep and steel relaxation models from the fib Model Code 2020. The stress–strain law for aging concrete is expressed by a second‐order differential equation, but a single rate‐type incremental equation is derived from the Kelvin chain approximation, considering the superposition principle. This approach avoids double integration, facilitates linear interpolation of compliance terms, improves accuracy, and simplifies the transition from integral to rate‐based formulations by maintaining the same basic procedure. The analysis compares rate and integral approaches through cross‐sectional examples, employing identical time interval discretization. Both formulations show close agreement for stresses and strains, with relative deviations below 0.1%. Rate‐type formulations avoid the need to store and update large historical stress and strain datasets, improving computational efficiency. This work highlights the strong correspondence between both approaches and supports the transition from integral to rate‐based formulations for practical applications in structural analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Structural Concrete
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.70035
Primary Topic
Concrete Properties and Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rate‐type and integral‐type sectional analysis for time‐dependent response with the fib Model Code 2020

Mauro Schulz
Structural Concrete
Concrete Properties and Behavior
article

Rate‐type and integral‐type sectional analysis for time‐dependent response with the fib Model Code 2020

Mauro Schulz
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study examines the time‐dependent behavior of reinforced and prestressed concrete structures using integral‐ and rate‐type formulations, applying the concrete creep and steel relaxation models from the fib Model Code 2020. The stress–strain law for aging concrete is expressed by a second‐order differential equation, but a single rate‐type incremental equation is derived from the Kelvin chain approximation, considering the superposition principle. This approach avoids double integration, facilitates linear interpolation of compliance terms, improves accuracy, and simplifies the transition from integral to rate‐based formulations by maintaining the same basic procedure. The analysis compares rate and integral approaches through cross‐sectional examples, employing identical time interval discretization. Both formulations show close agreement for stresses and strains, with relative deviations below 0.1%. Rate‐type formulations avoid the need to store and update large historical stress and strain datasets, improving computational efficiency. This work highlights the strong correspondence between both approaches and supports the transition from integral to rate‐based formulations for practical applications in structural analysis.

Structural ConcreteVol. 26(6)
Universidade Federal Fluminense (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Concrete Properties and Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.