Resolving the Super-Earth/Gas Giant Connection in Stellar Mass and Metallicity

Abstract The observed correlation between inner super-Earths (SE) and outer gas giants (GG) places strong constraints on formation theories. Building on previous work, M. L. Bryan & E. J. Lee showed that there is a statistically significant positive correlation between super-Earths and outer gas giants around metal-rich FGK stars, and that this correlation disappears for metal-poor hosts. Here we consider how this connection evolves across stellar mass. Starting with our sample of 85 M dwarfs (<0.6 M ⊙ ) hosting inner super-Earths, we calculate P(GG∣SE, [Fe/H] > 0) = 9.4 (+10.2 −3.1)% and P(GG∣SE, [Fe/H] ≤ 0) < 3.1%. Compared to the field gas giant frequency calculated from the L. J. Rosenthal et al. sample, we find P(GG∣[Fe/H] > 0) = 10.3 (+6.9 −3.1)%, and P(GG∣[Fe/H] ≤ 0) < 2.6% for M dwarfs. While we see a higher gas giant frequency around metal-rich M dwarfs for both samples, we find no significant correlations between super-Earths and gas giants. Combining our 85 M dwarf sample with our FGK sample from M. L. Bryan & E. J. Lee, we resolve the SE/GG correlation in stellar mass (0.3–1.5 M ⊙ ) and metallicity. We show the positive correlation emerges in metal-rich K dwarfs and strengthens with increasing stellar mass. Gas giant properties also impact the correlation—for metal-rich stars, the positive correlation is strengthened by (1) dynamically hot gas giants for all stellar masses; (2) distant gas giants only for higher mass stars; and (3) single gas giants for K dwarfs and multiple gas giants around more massive stars. We discuss how the stellar mass dependence of the inner–outer planet correlation can be understood from the increasing disk mass budget for higher mass stars.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal Letters
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/adb0bd
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.24
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resolving the Super-Earth/Gas Giant Connection in Stellar Mass and Metallicity

Marta L. Bryan, Eve J. Lee
8 citations
The Astrophysical Journal Letters
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
9.24
article

Resolving the Super-Earth/Gas Giant Connection in Stellar Mass and Metallicity

Marta L. Bryan, Eve J. Lee
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract The observed correlation between inner super-Earths (SE) and outer gas giants (GG) places strong constraints on formation theories. Building on previous work, M. L. Bryan & E. J. Lee showed that there is a statistically significant positive correlation between super-Earths and outer gas giants around metal-rich FGK stars, and that this correlation disappears for metal-poor hosts. Here we consider how this connection evolves across stellar mass. Starting with our sample of 85 M dwarfs (<0.6 M ⊙ ) hosting inner super-Earths, we calculate P(GG∣SE, [Fe/H] > 0) = 9.4 (+10.2 −3.1)% and P(GG∣SE, [Fe/H] ≤ 0) < 3.1%. Compared to the field gas giant frequency calculated from the L. J. Rosenthal et al. sample, we find P(GG∣[Fe/H] > 0) = 10.3 (+6.9 −3.1)%, and P(GG∣[Fe/H] ≤ 0) < 2.6% for M dwarfs. While we see a higher gas giant frequency around metal-rich M dwarfs for both samples, we find no significant correlations between super-Earths and gas giants. Combining our 85 M dwarf sample with our FGK sample from M. L. Bryan & E. J. Lee, we resolve the SE/GG correlation in stellar mass (0.3–1.5 M ⊙ ) and metallicity. We show the positive correlation emerges in metal-rich K dwarfs and strengthens with increasing stellar mass. Gas giant properties also impact the correlation—for metal-rich stars, the positive correlation is strengthened by (1) dynamically hot gas giants for all stellar masses; (2) distant gas giants only for higher mass stars; and (3) single gas giants for K dwarfs and multiple gas giants around more massive stars. We discuss how the stellar mass dependence of the inner–outer planet correlation can be understood from the increasing disk mass budget for higher mass stars.

The Astrophysical Journal LettersVol. 982(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
9.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.