Estimating Reference Evapotranspiration Using Reanalysis Data from the Google Earth Engine: A Case Study From an Arid Hydrological Region in Mexico

ABSTRACT Reference evapotranspiration (ETo) and crop coefficients (Kc) can be used for the estimation of crop water requirements. Estimating the ETo using the FAO‐56 Penman–Monteith (FAO‐56 PM) method requires various climatic variables that are not commonly available in developing countries. The emergence of long‐term assimilated reanalysis products offers an alternative for consistent climate data. However, reanalysis data (RD) must be validated before being applied regionally. This document presents the evaluation of five reanalysis datasets (CFSv2, GLDAS, NLDAS, RTMA, and the NASA‐POWER [NP]) to estimate ETo in an arid hydrological region of northern Mexico using daily information observed at 26 meteorological stations. Additionally, four different cases are examined, in which the FAO‐56 PM and Hargreaves and Samani (HS) methods are used with reanalysis and measured data. According to the results, the RTMA data show the best performance for temperature, CFSv2 for wind speed, and the NP for solar radiation. Although NLDAS contains hourly information, it has low performance. The five datasets tend to overestimate ETo. The FAO‐56 PM method combined with RD outperforms the HS method. In the study area, when observed data are not available, ETo can be estimated via the FAO‐56 PM method and RD from different sets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Irrigation and Drainage
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.3099
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating Reference Evapotranspiration Using Reanalysis Data from the Google Earth Engine: A Case Study From an Arid Hydrological Region in Mexico

Marco A. Inzunza-Ibarra, Sergio Iván Jiménez‐Jiménez, José Alberto Urrieta-Velázquez, Mariana de Jesús Marcial‐Pablo et al.
1 citations
Irrigation and Drainage
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
1.11
article

Estimating Reference Evapotranspiration Using Reanalysis Data from the Google Earth Engine: A Case Study From an Arid Hydrological Region in Mexico

Marco A. Inzunza-Ibarra, Sergio Iván Jiménez‐Jiménez, José Alberto Urrieta-Velázquez, Mariana de Jesús Marcial‐Pablo, Waldo Ojeda‐Bustamante, Ignacio Sánchez Cohen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Reference evapotranspiration (ETo) and crop coefficients (Kc) can be used for the estimation of crop water requirements. Estimating the ETo using the FAO‐56 Penman–Monteith (FAO‐56 PM) method requires various climatic variables that are not commonly available in developing countries. The emergence of long‐term assimilated reanalysis products offers an alternative for consistent climate data. However, reanalysis data (RD) must be validated before being applied regionally. This document presents the evaluation of five reanalysis datasets (CFSv2, GLDAS, NLDAS, RTMA, and the NASA‐POWER [NP]) to estimate ETo in an arid hydrological region of northern Mexico using daily information observed at 26 meteorological stations. Additionally, four different cases are examined, in which the FAO‐56 PM and Hargreaves and Samani (HS) methods are used with reanalysis and measured data. According to the results, the RTMA data show the best performance for temperature, CFSv2 for wind speed, and the NP for solar radiation. Although NLDAS contains hourly information, it has low performance. The five datasets tend to overestimate ETo. The FAO‐56 PM method combined with RD outperforms the HS method. In the study area, when observed data are not available, ETo can be estimated via the FAO‐56 PM method and RD from different sets.

Irrigation and DrainageVol. 74(4)
Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero (MX), Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales Agrícolas y Pecuarias (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.