On the deep‐water and shallow‐water limits of the intermediate long wave equation from a statistical viewpoint

Abstract We study convergence problems for the intermediate long wave (ILW) equation, with the depth parameter , in the deep‐water limit () and the shallow‐water limit () from a statistical point of view. In particular, we establish convergence of invariant Gibbs dynamics for ILW in both the deep‐water and shallow‐water limits. For this purpose, we first construct the Gibbs measures for ILW, . As they are supported on distributions, a renormalization is required. With the Wick renormalization, we carry out the construction of the Gibbs measures for ILW. We then prove that the Gibbs measures for ILW converge in total variation to that for the Benjamin–Ono (BO) equation in the deep‐water limit (). In the shallow‐water regime, after applying a scaling transformation, we prove that, as , the Gibbs measures for the scaled ILW converge weakly to that for the Korteweg–de Vries (KdV) equation. We point out that this second result is of particular interest because the Gibbs measures for the scaled ILW and KdV are mutually singular (whereas the Gibbs measures for ILW and BO are equivalent). In terms of dynamics, we use a compactness argument to construct invariant Gibbs dynamics for ILW (without uniqueness). Furthermore, we show that, by extracting a sequence , this invariant Gibbs dynamics for ILW converges to that for BO in the deep‐water limit () and to that for KdV (after the scaling) in the shallow‐water limit (), respectively. Finally, we point out that our results also apply to the generalized ILW equation in the defocusing case, converging to the generalized BO in the deep‐water limit and to the generalized KdV in the shallow‐water limit. In the non‐defocusing case, however, our results cannot be extended to a nonlinearity with a higher power due to the nonnormalizability of the corresponding Gibbs measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transactions of the London Mathematical Society
Published
2025-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1112/tlm3.70005
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Mathematical Physics Problems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.38

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the deep‐water and shallow‐water limits of the intermediate long wave equation from a statistical viewpoint

Guangqu Zheng, Tadahiro Oh, Guopeng Li
2 citations
Transactions of the London Mathematical Society
Advanced Mathematical Physics Problems
7.38
article

On the deep‐water and shallow‐water limits of the intermediate long wave equation from a statistical viewpoint

Guangqu Zheng, Tadahiro Oh, Guopeng Li
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract We study convergence problems for the intermediate long wave (ILW) equation, with the depth parameter , in the deep‐water limit () and the shallow‐water limit () from a statistical point of view. In particular, we establish convergence of invariant Gibbs dynamics for ILW in both the deep‐water and shallow‐water limits. For this purpose, we first construct the Gibbs measures for ILW, . As they are supported on distributions, a renormalization is required. With the Wick renormalization, we carry out the construction of the Gibbs measures for ILW. We then prove that the Gibbs measures for ILW converge in total variation to that for the Benjamin–Ono (BO) equation in the deep‐water limit (). In the shallow‐water regime, after applying a scaling transformation, we prove that, as , the Gibbs measures for the scaled ILW converge weakly to that for the Korteweg–de Vries (KdV) equation. We point out that this second result is of particular interest because the Gibbs measures for the scaled ILW and KdV are mutually singular (whereas the Gibbs measures for ILW and BO are equivalent). In terms of dynamics, we use a compactness argument to construct invariant Gibbs dynamics for ILW (without uniqueness). Furthermore, we show that, by extracting a sequence , this invariant Gibbs dynamics for ILW converges to that for BO in the deep‐water limit () and to that for KdV (after the scaling) in the shallow‐water limit (), respectively. Finally, we point out that our results also apply to the generalized ILW equation in the defocusing case, converging to the generalized BO in the deep‐water limit and to the generalized KdV in the shallow‐water limit. In the non‐defocusing case, however, our results cannot be extended to a nonlinearity with a higher power due to the nonnormalizability of the corresponding Gibbs measures.

Transactions of the London Mathematical SocietyVol. 12(1)
Boston University (US), Beijing Institute of Technology (CN), University of Liverpool (GB), Maxwell Institute for Mathematical Sciences (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Heriot-Watt University, Scottish Funding Council, University of Edinburgh, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Advanced Mathematical Physics Problems
7.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.