4CPS-190 Optimisation of adalimumab in children with inflammatory bowel disease: key factors for dose escalation

<h3>Background and Importance</h3> Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) presents significant treatment challenges due to limited therapeutic options, particularly in children. Maximising the effectiveness of available treatments, like adalimumab, is crucial to improve patient outcomes. Therefore, early identification of patients most likely to adjust dosage could help optimise treatment. <h3>Aim and Objectives</h3> To describe the characteristics of IBD paediatric patients (PP) treated with adalimumab in order to identify features of those requiring dose escalation for optimisation. <h3>Material and Methods</h3> Observational, retrospective study including all IBD PP treated with adalimumab from January-2019 to July-2024. Data collected: sex, age, diagnosis, medications, adalimumab levels (AL) after induction, at 6 months, and at 1 year. Calprotectin levels and concomitant medication were evaluated at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and reasons for discontinuation were also recorded. <h3>Results</h3> 31 patients included, 61.0% male, median age 12 years (IQR 4). 84.0% had Crohn’s disease and 16.0% ulcerative colitis. Before starting adalimumab, 71.0% were on azathioprine, 32.3% on systemic glucocorticoids, and on 16.1% mesalamine. The median AL were 11.0 (IQR 5.5) after induction, 12.1 (IQR 5.7) at 6 months, and 10.6 (IQR 8.2) at 12 months. Patients who required dose escalation had median AL of 9.4 (IQR 6.8) at 6 months and 8.3 (IQR 4.4) at 12 months, compared to 12.5 (IQR 5.2) and 13.2 (IQR 7.1) for those who did not require escalation. Calprotectin levels were classified into three groups: &gt;3000 (12.9%), 2000–3000 (29.0%), and &lt;2000 (58.1%). It was observed that 75% of patients with calprotectin &gt;3000 and 67% of those with calprotectin between 2000–3000 required dose escalation. 55% of patients on azathioprine at baseline also required dose escalation. During the study period, 58.1% of patients required dose escalation or increased dosing frequency. ADRs were reported by 23% of patients, being the most common Herpes-Zoster, respiratory infections, and skin rash (28.6% each one). 29% of patients discontinued treatment, mainly due to secondary loss of response (66.7%). <h3>Conclusion and Relevance</h3> This study suggests that higher doses of adalimumab may be necessary for IBD PP with baseline calprotectin levels &gt;2000 or those receiving concomitant azathioprine. A proactive pharmacokinetic monitoring approach of AL could optimise treatment and improve outcomes. <h3>References and/or Acknowledgements</h3> <h3>Conflict of Interest</h3> No conflict of interest

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-eahp.252
Primary Topic
Microscopic Colitis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

4CPS-190 Optimisation of adalimumab in children with inflammatory bowel disease: key factors for dose escalation

MT Pozas Del Río, Anna Merino, AM Agüí Callejas, B Leal Pino et al.
Microscopic Colitis
article

4CPS-190 Optimisation of adalimumab in children with inflammatory bowel disease: key factors for dose escalation

MT Pozas Del Río, Anna Merino, AM Agüí Callejas, B Leal Pino, P. García Rodríguez, B Riva de la Hoz, Luisa Romero, E Algarra Sánchez, Mitzi Kelly Garzon Miguel, B Fernández Rubio
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background and Importance</h3> Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) presents significant treatment challenges due to limited therapeutic options, particularly in children. Maximising the effectiveness of available treatments, like adalimumab, is crucial to improve patient outcomes. Therefore, early identification of patients most likely to adjust dosage could help optimise treatment. <h3>Aim and Objectives</h3> To describe the characteristics of IBD paediatric patients (PP) treated with adalimumab in order to identify features of those requiring dose escalation for optimisation. <h3>Material and Methods</h3> Observational, retrospective study including all IBD PP treated with adalimumab from January-2019 to July-2024. Data collected: sex, age, diagnosis, medications, adalimumab levels (AL) after induction, at 6 months, and at 1 year. Calprotectin levels and concomitant medication were evaluated at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and reasons for discontinuation were also recorded. <h3>Results</h3> 31 patients included, 61.0% male, median age 12 years (IQR 4). 84.0% had Crohn’s disease and 16.0% ulcerative colitis. Before starting adalimumab, 71.0% were on azathioprine, 32.3% on systemic glucocorticoids, and on 16.1% mesalamine. The median AL were 11.0 (IQR 5.5) after induction, 12.1 (IQR 5.7) at 6 months, and 10.6 (IQR 8.2) at 12 months. Patients who required dose escalation had median AL of 9.4 (IQR 6.8) at 6 months and 8.3 (IQR 4.4) at 12 months, compared to 12.5 (IQR 5.2) and 13.2 (IQR 7.1) for those who did not require escalation. Calprotectin levels were classified into three groups: &gt;3000 (12.9%), 2000–3000 (29.0%), and &lt;2000 (58.1%). It was observed that 75% of patients with calprotectin &gt;3000 and 67% of those with calprotectin between 2000–3000 required dose escalation. 55% of patients on azathioprine at baseline also required dose escalation. During the study period, 58.1% of patients required dose escalation or increased dosing frequency. ADRs were reported by 23% of patients, being the most common Herpes-Zoster, respiratory infections, and skin rash (28.6% each one). 29% of patients discontinued treatment, mainly due to secondary loss of response (66.7%). <h3>Conclusion and Relevance</h3> This study suggests that higher doses of adalimumab may be necessary for IBD PP with baseline calprotectin levels &gt;2000 or those receiving concomitant azathioprine. A proactive pharmacokinetic monitoring approach of AL could optimise treatment and improve outcomes. <h3>References and/or Acknowledgements</h3> <h3>Conflict of Interest</h3> No conflict of interest

Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Microscopic Colitis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.