4CPS-207 Comparative study of adherence rates to computerised injectable antibiotic protocols

<h3>Background and Importance</h3> The establishment of protocols for the prescription of injectable antibiotics (IA) is a crucial component of medication safety. Computerised antibiotic protocols (CAP) are available in our institution as a prescribing support tool. <h3>Aim and Objectives</h3> The objective is to evaluate the current adherence rate to CAP and compare it with previous data. <h3>Material and Methods</h3> A prospective collection of each IA prescription was conducted from July 2024 to August 2024 using the Pharma Class decision support system. The prescriptions were subsequently analysed using a collection grid comprising eight criteria: type of prescription, presence of a solvent, nature of the solvent, dilution volume, infusion duration, administration route, continuous or intermittent infusion modality, and frequency of administration. A comparative analysis of the results was then conducted using data collected from July 2022 to August 2022. <h3>Results</h3> Overall, CAP adherence was observed in 63% (126/200) of prescriptions in 2024 compared to 50% (109/217) in 2022, indicating a statistically significant improvement in prescription quality (p=0.0085; α=5%). The most frequently prescribed antibiotic during both study periods was ceftriaxone, with adherence rates improving from 24% (12/50) in 2022 to 68% (28/41) in 2024. Amoxicillin-clavulanate achieved a 100% adherence rate (10/10) in 2024, up from 66% (23/35) in 2022. In 2022, four departments (geriatrics, digestive surgery, dermatology, and gastroenterology) accounted for 76% of off-protocol prescriptions, reduced to only 19% in 2024. Conversely, oncology and haematology had off-protocol prescriptions in 73% (11/15) and 58% (14/24) of cases in 2024, respectively, as these departments were not included in the 2022 study. Furthermore, 99.5% of off-protocol prescriptions were non-compliant with CAP on at least one evaluation criterion in 2024, compared to 100% in 2022. <h3>Conclusion and Relevance</h3> Improvement initiatives (training, flyers, and pharmaceutical interventions) implemented since 2022 may account for the increased adherence of physicians to computerised protocols. However, the analysis of these practices has identified issues with the utilisation of these protocols, particularly in haematology (single-route infusion not allowing prolonged administration via CAP), leading to the development of an adapted protocol. Further avenues for continuous improvement, in collaboration with prescribers, need to be explored to sustain and enhance adherence to protocols and maintain the quality of IA prescriptions. <h3>References and/or Acknowledgements</h3> <h3>Conflict of Interest</h3> No conflict of interest

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-eahp.267
Primary Topic
Medication Adherence and Compliance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

4CPS-207 Comparative study of adherence rates to computerised injectable antibiotic protocols

M. Questel, A Feral
Medication Adherence and Compliance
article

4CPS-207 Comparative study of adherence rates to computerised injectable antibiotic protocols

M. Questel, A Feral
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background and Importance</h3> The establishment of protocols for the prescription of injectable antibiotics (IA) is a crucial component of medication safety. Computerised antibiotic protocols (CAP) are available in our institution as a prescribing support tool. <h3>Aim and Objectives</h3> The objective is to evaluate the current adherence rate to CAP and compare it with previous data. <h3>Material and Methods</h3> A prospective collection of each IA prescription was conducted from July 2024 to August 2024 using the Pharma Class decision support system. The prescriptions were subsequently analysed using a collection grid comprising eight criteria: type of prescription, presence of a solvent, nature of the solvent, dilution volume, infusion duration, administration route, continuous or intermittent infusion modality, and frequency of administration. A comparative analysis of the results was then conducted using data collected from July 2022 to August 2022. <h3>Results</h3> Overall, CAP adherence was observed in 63% (126/200) of prescriptions in 2024 compared to 50% (109/217) in 2022, indicating a statistically significant improvement in prescription quality (p=0.0085; α=5%). The most frequently prescribed antibiotic during both study periods was ceftriaxone, with adherence rates improving from 24% (12/50) in 2022 to 68% (28/41) in 2024. Amoxicillin-clavulanate achieved a 100% adherence rate (10/10) in 2024, up from 66% (23/35) in 2022. In 2022, four departments (geriatrics, digestive surgery, dermatology, and gastroenterology) accounted for 76% of off-protocol prescriptions, reduced to only 19% in 2024. Conversely, oncology and haematology had off-protocol prescriptions in 73% (11/15) and 58% (14/24) of cases in 2024, respectively, as these departments were not included in the 2022 study. Furthermore, 99.5% of off-protocol prescriptions were non-compliant with CAP on at least one evaluation criterion in 2024, compared to 100% in 2022. <h3>Conclusion and Relevance</h3> Improvement initiatives (training, flyers, and pharmaceutical interventions) implemented since 2022 may account for the increased adherence of physicians to computerised protocols. However, the analysis of these practices has identified issues with the utilisation of these protocols, particularly in haematology (single-route infusion not allowing prolonged administration via CAP), leading to the development of an adapted protocol. Further avenues for continuous improvement, in collaboration with prescribers, need to be explored to sustain and enhance adherence to protocols and maintain the quality of IA prescriptions. <h3>References and/or Acknowledgements</h3> <h3>Conflict of Interest</h3> No conflict of interest

Centre Hospitalier Victor Dupouy (FR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Medication Adherence and Compliance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.