1ISG-004 Abstract withdrawn

<h3>Background and Importance</h3> In a total of 21 studies (3,017 patients with locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer), the use of nal-IRI, together with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin, led to a significant improvement in PFS and OS, with a pooled mean difference of 1.01 months (2.87 vs. 1.87 months) (95% CI = 0.97–1.05, p&lt;0.01) and 0.29 months (95% CI = 0.18–0.39, p&lt;0.01), respectively. <h3>Aim and Objectives</h3> The aim of the study was to compare the costs of treatment with nanoliposomal-irinotecan in combination with fluorouracil and leucovorin (nal-IRI+5-FU/LV) versus modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) as second-line treatment after gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel (GnP) for metastatic and recurrent pancreatic cancer. <h3>Material and Methods</h3> We analysed the costs of nal-IRI+5-FU/LV or mFFX therapies in our hospital. Data were extracted from the AREAS management software and the purchase prices of drugs and DM necessary for the preparation of the therapies of each cycle were taken into account for an average patient of 80kg, 180cm tall and 2sqm. The nal-IRI+5-FU/LV has an average duration of 6 cycles (2.87 months) while mFFX of 4 cycles (1.87 months). The costs of the necessary personnel and indirect costs, not easily identifiable, were not taken into account. Furthermore, the incidence of side effects was evaluated for both alternatives. Results nal-IRI+5-FU/LV has a cost of €923.5/cycle (€5,541.27/6 cycles) while mFFX €48.13/cycle (€192.52/4 cycles) with a difference of €5,348.75 per patient, equivalent to the month gained in PFS. However, with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV an increased risk of neutropenia, anaemia, hypokalaemia, diarrhoea and vomiting of grade 3 or higher was also noted compared to mFFX, manageable adverse events. <h3>Conclusion and Relevance</h3> Second-line treatments based on Nal-IRI have shown a significant improvement in PFS and OS compared to other available treatments in advanced pancreatic cancer, despite an increase in toxicity and healthcare costs required for the most modern treatment. Further research is also needed to define the role of nal-IRI both in the first and subsequent lines of therapy, also considering an increase in costs for the NHS, as in the NAPOLI-2 studies in biliary cancer (NCT04005339) and NAPOLI-3 in first-line pancreatic cancer. <h3>References and/or Acknowledgements</h3> Crit.Rev. Oncol.Hematol. 2024 May 10:104386. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104386. PMID: 38735505 Wainberg, <i>et al</i>. STUDIO NAPOLI-3 cancro pancreas di prima linea :2023b <h3>Conflict of Interest</h3> No conflict of interest

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-eahp.12
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

1ISG-004 Abstract withdrawn

A Vergati, Alessandro Cavaliere, T Gregori
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

1ISG-004 Abstract withdrawn

A Vergati, Alessandro Cavaliere, T Gregori
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background and Importance</h3> In a total of 21 studies (3,017 patients with locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer), the use of nal-IRI, together with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin, led to a significant improvement in PFS and OS, with a pooled mean difference of 1.01 months (2.87 vs. 1.87 months) (95% CI = 0.97–1.05, p&lt;0.01) and 0.29 months (95% CI = 0.18–0.39, p&lt;0.01), respectively. <h3>Aim and Objectives</h3> The aim of the study was to compare the costs of treatment with nanoliposomal-irinotecan in combination with fluorouracil and leucovorin (nal-IRI+5-FU/LV) versus modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) as second-line treatment after gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel (GnP) for metastatic and recurrent pancreatic cancer. <h3>Material and Methods</h3> We analysed the costs of nal-IRI+5-FU/LV or mFFX therapies in our hospital. Data were extracted from the AREAS management software and the purchase prices of drugs and DM necessary for the preparation of the therapies of each cycle were taken into account for an average patient of 80kg, 180cm tall and 2sqm. The nal-IRI+5-FU/LV has an average duration of 6 cycles (2.87 months) while mFFX of 4 cycles (1.87 months). The costs of the necessary personnel and indirect costs, not easily identifiable, were not taken into account. Furthermore, the incidence of side effects was evaluated for both alternatives. Results nal-IRI+5-FU/LV has a cost of €923.5/cycle (€5,541.27/6 cycles) while mFFX €48.13/cycle (€192.52/4 cycles) with a difference of €5,348.75 per patient, equivalent to the month gained in PFS. However, with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV an increased risk of neutropenia, anaemia, hypokalaemia, diarrhoea and vomiting of grade 3 or higher was also noted compared to mFFX, manageable adverse events. <h3>Conclusion and Relevance</h3> Second-line treatments based on Nal-IRI have shown a significant improvement in PFS and OS compared to other available treatments in advanced pancreatic cancer, despite an increase in toxicity and healthcare costs required for the most modern treatment. Further research is also needed to define the role of nal-IRI both in the first and subsequent lines of therapy, also considering an increase in costs for the NHS, as in the NAPOLI-2 studies in biliary cancer (NCT04005339) and NAPOLI-3 in first-line pancreatic cancer. <h3>References and/or Acknowledgements</h3> Crit.Rev. Oncol.Hematol. 2024 May 10:104386. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104386. PMID: 38735505 Wainberg, <i>et al</i>. STUDIO NAPOLI-3 cancro pancreas di prima linea :2023b <h3>Conflict of Interest</h3> No conflict of interest

Azienda Sanitaria Locale Viterbo (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.