5PSQ-094 Efficacy of basiliximab versus thymoglobulin in renal transplant induction therapy

<h3>Background and Importance</h3> Basiliximab (anti CD-25) and thymoglobulin (T-lymphocyte depleting agent) are used together with other immunosuppressants in renal transplant induction therapy for the prevention of acute rejection. The selection of the appropriate induction regimen, depending on the patient’s immunological risk, is key to ensure the success of the transplantation. <h3>Aim and Objectives</h3> To evaluate the efficacy of protocolised induction immunosuppressive therapy with basiliximab and thymoglobulin in renal transplantation. <h3>Material and Methods</h3> Retrospective and descriptive observational study carried out on patients transplanted during 01/2012 - 09/2023 in a tertiary general hospital. Patients, according to the protocol established in the centre, were treated with basiliximab or thymoglobulin in case of low or high immunological risk, respectively. The analysed variables were obtained from the Orion Clinic software: sex, age, weight, date of transplant, immunosuppressor used in conjunction with the dose administered: basiliximab 20mg on days +1 and +4 post-transplant and thymoglobulin 5 mg/kg/total cumulative dose for 3 to 9 days after the intervention, and concomitant immunosuppressive treatment. The effectiveness was evaluated by the rejection rates at 6 and 12 months after the transplantation, according to the literature reviewed. <h3>Results</h3> During the evaluated period, a total of 260 patients were transplanted: 65% men (169) and 35% women (91), with a mean age of 57 ±11.90 years. In addition, all patients were also treated with mycophenolate mofetil, prednisone and tacrolimus. Of these, 41.15% (107) of patients received basiliximab according to procotol, and 58.85% (153) of patients received thymoglobulin with a total cumulative mean dose of 6.1mg/kg. Among these 153 patients treated with thymoglobulin, 22.22% received &lt;5mg/kg due to haematological toxicity. Regarding to the rejection rates, 14.01% (15) and 0.93% (1) experienced rejection among the group of basiliximab after 6 and 12 months, respectively. While 12.42% (19) and 0.65% (1) experienced rejection among the group of thymoglobulin after 6 and 12 months, respectively, of which only two patients received doses &lt;5mg/kg because of toxicity. <h3>Conclusion and Relevance</h3> In our study population, basiliximab induction therapy in patients at low immunological risk was similarly effective as thymoglobulin therapy in patients at high immunological risk in renal transplantation, along with all other immunosuppressants, according to the literature reviewed. <h3>References and/or Acknowledgements</h3> <h3>Conflict of Interest</h3> No conflict of interest

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2025-eahp.390
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.99
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

5PSQ-094 Efficacy of basiliximab versus thymoglobulin in renal transplant induction therapy

C Matoses Chirivella, MJ Lucas Mayol, María S. Giménez, María-José Such et al.
1 citations
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
1.99
article

5PSQ-094 Efficacy of basiliximab versus thymoglobulin in renal transplant induction therapy

C Matoses Chirivella, MJ Lucas Mayol, María S. Giménez, María-José Such, AC Murcia López, L Peral Ballester
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<h3>Background and Importance</h3> Basiliximab (anti CD-25) and thymoglobulin (T-lymphocyte depleting agent) are used together with other immunosuppressants in renal transplant induction therapy for the prevention of acute rejection. The selection of the appropriate induction regimen, depending on the patient’s immunological risk, is key to ensure the success of the transplantation. <h3>Aim and Objectives</h3> To evaluate the efficacy of protocolised induction immunosuppressive therapy with basiliximab and thymoglobulin in renal transplantation. <h3>Material and Methods</h3> Retrospective and descriptive observational study carried out on patients transplanted during 01/2012 - 09/2023 in a tertiary general hospital. Patients, according to the protocol established in the centre, were treated with basiliximab or thymoglobulin in case of low or high immunological risk, respectively. The analysed variables were obtained from the Orion Clinic software: sex, age, weight, date of transplant, immunosuppressor used in conjunction with the dose administered: basiliximab 20mg on days +1 and +4 post-transplant and thymoglobulin 5 mg/kg/total cumulative dose for 3 to 9 days after the intervention, and concomitant immunosuppressive treatment. The effectiveness was evaluated by the rejection rates at 6 and 12 months after the transplantation, according to the literature reviewed. <h3>Results</h3> During the evaluated period, a total of 260 patients were transplanted: 65% men (169) and 35% women (91), with a mean age of 57 ±11.90 years. In addition, all patients were also treated with mycophenolate mofetil, prednisone and tacrolimus. Of these, 41.15% (107) of patients received basiliximab according to procotol, and 58.85% (153) of patients received thymoglobulin with a total cumulative mean dose of 6.1mg/kg. Among these 153 patients treated with thymoglobulin, 22.22% received &lt;5mg/kg due to haematological toxicity. Regarding to the rejection rates, 14.01% (15) and 0.93% (1) experienced rejection among the group of basiliximab after 6 and 12 months, respectively. While 12.42% (19) and 0.65% (1) experienced rejection among the group of thymoglobulin after 6 and 12 months, respectively, of which only two patients received doses &lt;5mg/kg because of toxicity. <h3>Conclusion and Relevance</h3> In our study population, basiliximab induction therapy in patients at low immunological risk was similarly effective as thymoglobulin therapy in patients at high immunological risk in renal transplantation, along with all other immunosuppressants, according to the literature reviewed. <h3>References and/or Acknowledgements</h3> <h3>Conflict of Interest</h3> No conflict of interest

Hospital General Universitario de Elche (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
1.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.