Identifying the best web accessibility workflows for legacy archival description data

This paper examines the challenges and solutions associated with making archival PDF finding aids accessible to blind and low-vision users, particularly those who rely on screen readers. The project, conducted at the University of Toronto, highlights the barriers posed by unstructured PDFs, which fail to meet the various accessibility standards specified in the WWW Consortium’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines. Three methods were tested to improve accessibility: manual remediation, PDF-to-HTML conversion, and data migration into the Access to Memory (AtoM) platform. The results indicated that both the manual and automated remediation methods were either too costly or ineffective, while the most promising approach involved migrating the description data into AtoM via CSV import, enhancing both accessibility and search functionality. The paper underscores the need for ongoing funding and professional expertise to address web accessibility issues in archival settings and outlines future steps to improve PDF generation within AtoM for broader application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of digital media management
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69554/cvni8426
Primary Topic
Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying the best web accessibility workflows for legacy archival description data

Curt Cutler, Isobel R. S. Carnegie
Journal of digital media management
Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
article

Identifying the best web accessibility workflows for legacy archival description data

Curt Cutler, Isobel R. S. Carnegie
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the challenges and solutions associated with making archival PDF finding aids accessible to blind and low-vision users, particularly those who rely on screen readers. The project, conducted at the University of Toronto, highlights the barriers posed by unstructured PDFs, which fail to meet the various accessibility standards specified in the WWW Consortium’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines. Three methods were tested to improve accessibility: manual remediation, PDF-to-HTML conversion, and data migration into the Access to Memory (AtoM) platform. The results indicated that both the manual and automated remediation methods were either too costly or ineffective, while the most promising approach involved migrating the description data into AtoM via CSV import, enhancing both accessibility and search functionality. The paper underscores the need for ongoing funding and professional expertise to address web accessibility issues in archival settings and outlines future steps to improve PDF generation within AtoM for broader application.

Journal of digital media managementVol. 13(3)
University of Toronto (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Identifying the best web accessibility workflows for legacy archival description data — Curt Cutler, Isobel R. S. Carnegie · Journal of digital media management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS