Binary Role Theory and Modeling the Superpower Confrontation in Ukraine

Abstract On February 24, 2022, Russian forces invaded Ukraine. Washington responded with economic sanctions and significant military arms and intelligence in the most dangerous situation between the two superpowers since the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962. Our analysis presents models from binary role theory, which allow us to identify the respective roles of the United States and Russia as agents in a strategic dyad during the diagnostic and prescriptive stages of the foreign policy decision-making process. Our empirical focus is on crucial decision-making episodes bracketed chronologically by two relatively big decisions: the United States decision in 1994 to invite former Warsaw Pact member states to join NATO and the Russian decision in 2022 to invade Ukraine. Our general approach is inspired by the goal of “bridging the gap” between academic and policy analyses regarding the conduct of foreign policy with a focus on the exercise of social power in world politics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foreign Policy Analysis
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/oraf005
Citations
1
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Binary Role Theory and Modeling the Superpower Confrontation in Ukraine

Akan Malici, Stephen G. Walker
1 citations
Foreign Policy Analysis
International Relations and Foreign Policy
8.52
article

Binary Role Theory and Modeling the Superpower Confrontation in Ukraine

Akan Malici, Stephen G. Walker
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract On February 24, 2022, Russian forces invaded Ukraine. Washington responded with economic sanctions and significant military arms and intelligence in the most dangerous situation between the two superpowers since the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962. Our analysis presents models from binary role theory, which allow us to identify the respective roles of the United States and Russia as agents in a strategic dyad during the diagnostic and prescriptive stages of the foreign policy decision-making process. Our empirical focus is on crucial decision-making episodes bracketed chronologically by two relatively big decisions: the United States decision in 1994 to invite former Warsaw Pact member states to join NATO and the Russian decision in 2022 to invade Ukraine. Our general approach is inspired by the goal of “bridging the gap” between academic and policy analyses regarding the conduct of foreign policy with a focus on the exercise of social power in world politics.

Foreign Policy AnalysisVol. 21(2)
Arizona State University (US), Furman University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.