55 Donor time to death and kidney transplant outcomes; global implications for DCD stand-down times

Abstract Background Lengthening waiting lists for organ transplantation mandate development of strategies to expand the deceased donor pool. Due to concerns regarding organ viability, most organ donation organisations internationally “stand-down” from potential circulatory death donors (DCD) after 1-2 hours, possibly underutilising an important organ source. UK policy mandates a minimum 3-hour stand-down time. Methods Population-cohort study (2013-2021) of adult DCD kidney-alone transplants from UK Transplant Registry. The impact of time to death (TTD) on post-transplant outcomes was assessed with adjusted regression models. Multiple imputation and restricted cubic splines were employed to deal with missing data and non-linearity. Results In 7,183 kidney transplant recipients, median (range) TTD was 15 (0-407) minutes, with 885 and 303 kidneys transplanted from donors with TTD over 1 and 2 hours, respectively. Donor TTD was not associated with 12-month eGFR on adjusted linear regression (change per doubling of TTD = -0.25, 95% CI -0.68 to 0.19, P=0.27), nor with delayed graft function (aOR=1.01; 0.97-1.06, P=0.65) or graft survival (aHR=1.00; 0.95-1.07, P=0.92). Results from restricted cubic spline models were in agreement. In contrast, asystolic time, cold ischaemic time, and reperfusion time independently predicted outcome. Compared to theoretical 1- or 2-hour stand-down times, UK policy (minimum 3-hour wait to stand-down) has led to 14.1% and 4.4% more DCD transplants, respectively. Conclusion Donor TTD does not impact on post-transplant outcomes, in contrast to subsequent ischaemic times. Altering international transplant practice to mandate minimum 3-hour donor stand-down times would substantially increase numbers of kidney transplants performed internationally without compromising outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf042.003
Primary Topic
Organ Donation and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

55 Donor time to death and kidney transplant outcomes; global implications for DCD stand-down times

Chris Callaghan, Jennifer L. Philip, Neil Sheerin, Nicholas Chung et al.
British journal of surgery
Organ Donation and Transplantation
article

55 Donor time to death and kidney transplant outcomes; global implications for DCD stand-down times

Chris Callaghan, Jennifer L. Philip, Neil Sheerin, Nicholas Chung, Emily K. Glover, Gavin J. Pettigrew, Dale Gardiner, Colin Wilson, Abdullah Malik, Samuel J Tingle, Georgios Kourounis, Jennifer Mehew, Emily Thompson
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Lengthening waiting lists for organ transplantation mandate development of strategies to expand the deceased donor pool. Due to concerns regarding organ viability, most organ donation organisations internationally “stand-down” from potential circulatory death donors (DCD) after 1-2 hours, possibly underutilising an important organ source. UK policy mandates a minimum 3-hour stand-down time. Methods Population-cohort study (2013-2021) of adult DCD kidney-alone transplants from UK Transplant Registry. The impact of time to death (TTD) on post-transplant outcomes was assessed with adjusted regression models. Multiple imputation and restricted cubic splines were employed to deal with missing data and non-linearity. Results In 7,183 kidney transplant recipients, median (range) TTD was 15 (0-407) minutes, with 885 and 303 kidneys transplanted from donors with TTD over 1 and 2 hours, respectively. Donor TTD was not associated with 12-month eGFR on adjusted linear regression (change per doubling of TTD = -0.25, 95% CI -0.68 to 0.19, P=0.27), nor with delayed graft function (aOR=1.01; 0.97-1.06, P=0.65) or graft survival (aHR=1.00; 0.95-1.07, P=0.92). Results from restricted cubic spline models were in agreement. In contrast, asystolic time, cold ischaemic time, and reperfusion time independently predicted outcome. Compared to theoretical 1- or 2-hour stand-down times, UK policy (minimum 3-hour wait to stand-down) has led to 14.1% and 4.4% more DCD transplants, respectively. Conclusion Donor TTD does not impact on post-transplant outcomes, in contrast to subsequent ischaemic times. Altering international transplant practice to mandate minimum 3-hour donor stand-down times would substantially increase numbers of kidney transplants performed internationally without compromising outcomes.

British journal of surgeryVol. 112(Supplement_6)
Guy's Hospital (GB), NHS Blood and Transplant (GB), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Cambridge (GB), Newcastle University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Organ Donation and Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.