58 Agreement in visual organ quality assessment: A comparative study between trainees and consultants

Abstract Introduction Optimising organ utilisation relies on accurate organ quality assessments. Though multiple factors influence decisions, subjective visual assessments of hepatic steatosis and renal perfusion remain the most reported reasons of non-utilisation of retrieved organs. Initial evaluations are typically conducted by trainee surgeons. This study assesses agreement of organ quality assessments between trainee and consultant transplant surgeons. Methods Surgeons were categorised as consultants (≥5 years experience) or trainees (<5 years experience). Nineteen surgeons (10 consultants, 9 trainees) from 8 centres assessed liver quality, and 17 surgeons (8 consultants, 9 trainees) from 8 centres evaluated kidney quality. Visual characteristics (Hepatic Steatosis – None/Mild/Moderate/Severe; Renal Perfusion – Good/Fair/Poor/Patchy) and overall organ quality (Good/Moderate/Poor) were scored. Inter-rater agreement on images reviewed by both trainees and consultants was determined. Results Photographs of 324 livers and 284 kidneys were assessed. Agreement between consultant and trainee surgeons on hepatic steatosis was poor (AC=0.36, 95%CI:0.31-0.41), while liver overall quality was moderate (AC=0.62, 95%CI:0.58-0.66). When disagreeing, trainees overestimated severity of steatosis, odds ratio OR=1.99 (95%CI:1.62-2.45), and overall quality, OR=1.47 (95%CI:1.14-1.89). Renal perfusion agreement was moderate (AC=0.55, 95%CI:0.49-0.61), with moderate to good agreement for overall quality (AC=0.64, 95%CI:0.59-0.69). Trainees again overestimated severity, OR=1.61 (95%CI:1.24-2.08) for perfusion quality and OR=1.50 (95%CI:1.16-2.18) for overall quality. Conclusions Trainees were more likely to overestimate severity during visual assessments. This underscores the importance of implementing decision aid tools, especially when retrievals are conducted by less experienced transplant surgeons, to optimise the use of donated organs and reduce unnecessary discards.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf042.058
Primary Topic
Digital Imaging in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

58 Agreement in visual organ quality assessment: A comparative study between trainees and consultants

Chris Callaghan, Avinash Sewpaul, Jeevan Prakash Gopal, Fanourios Georgiades et al.
British journal of surgery
Digital Imaging in Medicine
article

58 Agreement in visual organ quality assessment: A comparative study between trainees and consultants

Chris Callaghan, Avinash Sewpaul, Jeevan Prakash Gopal, Fanourios Georgiades, James Hunter, Balaji Mahendran, Christopher J.E. Watson, Ali Ahmed Elmahmudi, Aaron Ahearn, John Asher, Colin Wilson, Joerg‐Matthias Pollok, Brian Thomson, B. M. Stephenson, Samuel J Tingle, Seiji Yamaguchi, Jeroen de Jonge, Hassan Ugail, Georgios Kourounis, B. Dasari, Emily Thompson, Rodrigo Figueiredo, Stuart F. Reynolds, Mohamed Aly M. El Shafei El Zawahry
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Optimising organ utilisation relies on accurate organ quality assessments. Though multiple factors influence decisions, subjective visual assessments of hepatic steatosis and renal perfusion remain the most reported reasons of non-utilisation of retrieved organs. Initial evaluations are typically conducted by trainee surgeons. This study assesses agreement of organ quality assessments between trainee and consultant transplant surgeons. Methods Surgeons were categorised as consultants (≥5 years experience) or trainees (<5 years experience). Nineteen surgeons (10 consultants, 9 trainees) from 8 centres assessed liver quality, and 17 surgeons (8 consultants, 9 trainees) from 8 centres evaluated kidney quality. Visual characteristics (Hepatic Steatosis – None/Mild/Moderate/Severe; Renal Perfusion – Good/Fair/Poor/Patchy) and overall organ quality (Good/Moderate/Poor) were scored. Inter-rater agreement on images reviewed by both trainees and consultants was determined. Results Photographs of 324 livers and 284 kidneys were assessed. Agreement between consultant and trainee surgeons on hepatic steatosis was poor (AC=0.36, 95%CI:0.31-0.41), while liver overall quality was moderate (AC=0.62, 95%CI:0.58-0.66). When disagreeing, trainees overestimated severity of steatosis, odds ratio OR=1.99 (95%CI:1.62-2.45), and overall quality, OR=1.47 (95%CI:1.14-1.89). Renal perfusion agreement was moderate (AC=0.55, 95%CI:0.49-0.61), with moderate to good agreement for overall quality (AC=0.64, 95%CI:0.59-0.69). Trainees again overestimated severity, OR=1.61 (95%CI:1.24-2.08) for perfusion quality and OR=1.50 (95%CI:1.16-2.18) for overall quality. Conclusions Trainees were more likely to overestimate severity during visual assessments. This underscores the importance of implementing decision aid tools, especially when retrievals are conducted by less experienced transplant surgeons, to optimise the use of donated organs and reduce unnecessary discards.

British journal of surgeryVol. 112(Supplement_6)
University of Southern California (US), Guy's Hospital (GB), University of Bradford (GB), University of California, San Francisco (US), Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham (GB), NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (GB), The Royal Free Hospital (GB), Freeman Hospital (GB), Erasmus MC (NL), Edinburgh Royal Infirmary (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Addenbrooke's Hospital (GB), University College London (GB), University of Newcastle Australia (AU), Newcastle University (GB), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Digital Imaging in Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.