Measuring the Degree of ‘Fit’ Within Social‐Ecological Systems to Support Local Flood Risk Decision‐Making

ABSTRACT Effective social‐ecological fit is considered essential for properly managing social‐ecological systems. Despite this importance, the concept of social‐ecological fit lacks the following: clarity in scope and definition, a practical quantitative method to assess effectiveness, and methods capable of equally assessing the social and ecological factors within the system being managed. To address these knowledge gaps, we reviewed how social‐ecological fit has been conceptualised in the literature and then tested the use of Bayesian Belief networks and analysis to quantitatively assess “fit” using the case of flooding in the North Onslow saltmarsh region of Truro, Nova Scotia. The objective of this study was to assess which decision‐making choices would most likely reduce flood risk, and therefore achieve the best ‘fit’. Drawing from a combination of existing literature and local expert opinion, we identified the relevant factors influencing flood risk in the region, their relationship to each other and their combined relationship to local flood risk. Ice jam frequency, high tide frequency and dyke maintenance were found to have the most influence. The results of this study can be used to inform local flood‐risk‐related decision‐making in Truro and act as a model for quantitatively assessing social‐ecological fit in other risk management settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.70006
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring the Degree of ‘Fit’ Within Social‐Ecological Systems to Support Local Flood Risk Decision‐Making

Imogen Hobbs, Gordon M. Hickey, Valentin Lucet, Jennifer M. Holzer et al.
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

Measuring the Degree of ‘Fit’ Within Social‐Ecological Systems to Support Local Flood Risk Decision‐Making

Imogen Hobbs, Gordon M. Hickey, Valentin Lucet, Jennifer M. Holzer, Julia Baird
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Effective social‐ecological fit is considered essential for properly managing social‐ecological systems. Despite this importance, the concept of social‐ecological fit lacks the following: clarity in scope and definition, a practical quantitative method to assess effectiveness, and methods capable of equally assessing the social and ecological factors within the system being managed. To address these knowledge gaps, we reviewed how social‐ecological fit has been conceptualised in the literature and then tested the use of Bayesian Belief networks and analysis to quantitatively assess “fit” using the case of flooding in the North Onslow saltmarsh region of Truro, Nova Scotia. The objective of this study was to assess which decision‐making choices would most likely reduce flood risk, and therefore achieve the best ‘fit’. Drawing from a combination of existing literature and local expert opinion, we identified the relevant factors influencing flood risk in the region, their relationship to each other and their combined relationship to local flood risk. Ice jam frequency, high tide frequency and dyke maintenance were found to have the most influence. The results of this study can be used to inform local flood‐risk‐related decision‐making in Truro and act as a model for quantitatively assessing social‐ecological fit in other risk management settings.

Journal of Flood Risk ManagementVol. 18(1)
Brock University (CA), McGill University (CA), Wilfrid Laurier University (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.