A sequence context-based approach for classifying tumor structural variants without paired normal samples

Although several recent studies have characterized structural variants (SVs) in germline and cancer genomes independently, the genomic contexts of these SVs have not been comprehensively compared. We examined similarities and differences between 2 million germline and 115 thousand tumor SVs from a cohort of 963 patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas. We found significant differences in features related to their genomic sequences and localization that suggest differences between SV-generating processes and selective pressures. For example, our results show that features linked to transposon-mediated processes are associated with germline SVs, while somatic SVs more frequently show features characteristic of chromoanagenesis. These genomic differences enabled us to develop a classifier-the Germline and Tumor Structural Variant or "the great GaTSV" -that accurately distinguishes between germline and cancer SVs in tumor samples that lack a matched normal sample.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cell Reports Methods
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmeth.2025.100991
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A sequence context-based approach for classifying tumor structural variants without paired normal samples

Simona Dalin, Marcin Imieliński, Alexander Crane, Wolu Chukwu et al.
Cell Reports Methods
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
article

A sequence context-based approach for classifying tumor structural variants without paired normal samples

Simona Dalin, Marcin Imieliński, Alexander Crane, Wolu Chukwu, Frank P. B. Dubois, Sophie Webster, Siyun Lee, Ipsa Mittra, Shu Zhang, Rameen Beroukhim, Oumayma Dakhama, Carlos Rauert
article en

Abstract

Although several recent studies have characterized structural variants (SVs) in germline and cancer genomes independently, the genomic contexts of these SVs have not been comprehensively compared. We examined similarities and differences between 2 million germline and 115 thousand tumor SVs from a cohort of 963 patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas. We found significant differences in features related to their genomic sequences and localization that suggest differences between SV-generating processes and selective pressures. For example, our results show that features linked to transposon-mediated processes are associated with germline SVs, while somatic SVs more frequently show features characteristic of chromoanagenesis. These genomic differences enabled us to develop a classifier-the Germline and Tumor Structural Variant or "the great GaTSV" -that accurately distinguishes between germline and cancer SVs in tumor samples that lack a matched normal sample.

Cell Reports MethodsVol. 5(3)
Broad Institute (US), Cornell University (US), Lander Institute (IL), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), New York Genome Center (US), Weill Cornell Medicine (US), NYU Langone’s Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University (US), Freie Universität Berlin (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.