Re-thinking the writing syllabus: How contextual factors inform curriculum revision

Recent studies demonstrate the effectiveness of needs analysis in relation to the language and communication goals of students. In this regard, different stakeholders contribute greatly to revision of curricula. While English language departments play an integral role in meeting the communication needs of learners, a more nuanced integration of stakeholders’ input is crucial. In this reflection, we detail the process of revising a writing syllabus, incorporating different stakeholders’ perspectives, expectations, and experiences. We argue that while needs analysis provides valuable instructional input, considering contextual factors is also essential in developing a sensible and holistic curriculum design that acknowledges ecological relationships between units in the university. Specifically, the interaction of the contextual factors, such as the course’s motivation, the writing and reading expectations of the different academic departments, and the priorities and experiences of teachers and students, led to the realignment of topics, and changes in task design and assessment practices in the revised writing syllabus.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in the South
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36615/6zhfhz25
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Re-thinking the writing syllabus: How contextual factors inform curriculum revision

Jonna Marie Lim, Aireen Barrios, Gina Ugalingan, Philip Rentillo
Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in the South
Student Assessment and Feedback
article

Re-thinking the writing syllabus: How contextual factors inform curriculum revision

Jonna Marie Lim, Aireen Barrios, Gina Ugalingan, Philip Rentillo
article en

Abstract

Recent studies demonstrate the effectiveness of needs analysis in relation to the language and communication goals of students. In this regard, different stakeholders contribute greatly to revision of curricula. While English language departments play an integral role in meeting the communication needs of learners, a more nuanced integration of stakeholders’ input is crucial. In this reflection, we detail the process of revising a writing syllabus, incorporating different stakeholders’ perspectives, expectations, and experiences. We argue that while needs analysis provides valuable instructional input, considering contextual factors is also essential in developing a sensible and holistic curriculum design that acknowledges ecological relationships between units in the university. Specifically, the interaction of the contextual factors, such as the course’s motivation, the writing and reading expectations of the different academic departments, and the priorities and experiences of teachers and students, led to the realignment of topics, and changes in task design and assessment practices in the revised writing syllabus.

Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in the SouthVol. 8(3)
De La Salle University (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Student Assessment and Feedback
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Re-thinking the writing syllabus: How contextual factors inform curriculum revision — Jonna Marie Lim, Aireen Barrios, et al. · Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in the South (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS