Shrinkage analysis of repacked soil samples enables quantifying the soil's potential physical quality

Abstract This paper investigates the physical properties of soil samples repacked from aggregate beds and the potential for retrieving representative soil pore properties at the field scale based on shrinkage analysis of a repacked composite sample. This approach was tested on 60 arable fields in Switzerland presenting a large range of soil organic carbon (SOC) and texture. Soil cores constituted from composite samples were repacked at the observed field bulk density. Their pore properties were compared to undisturbed soil samples from the same fields. The soil pore properties were characterized using shrinkage analysis and correlated to soil texture and SOC. The repacking protocol successfully recreated structured samples. The <40‐µm equivalent diameter pore and structural pore size distributions were comparable to those of the undisturbed soils. For pores >40 µm, a larger porosity was measured for repacked samples compared to undisturbed ones, limiting the approach to assess the structure and dynamics of larger soil pores. Furthermore, soil clay content as well as SOC were strong predictors for the samples’ physical properties including pore space. The increase in structural porosity in the repacked sample was inversely proportional to the structural porosity already present in the undisturbed samples. Steeper regression slopes of the pore volume to SOC or clay relationship were observed for the repacked samples. These slope changes were comparable to those observed in soil structure restoration experiments and opposite to those observed in soil compaction trials. We conclude that repacking soil from a composite sample allows us to characterize the potential soil structure condition with respect to its SOC and clay content. The method can be used to assess soil structure quality in response to changes in soil management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.70033
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shrinkage analysis of repacked soil samples enables quantifying the soil's potential physical quality

Sebastian Döetterl, Cédric Deluz, Thomas Keller, Pascal Boivin et al.
1 citations
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
0.95
article

Shrinkage analysis of repacked soil samples enables quantifying the soil's potential physical quality

Sebastian Döetterl, Cédric Deluz, Thomas Keller, Pascal Boivin, Alyssa Deluz
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper investigates the physical properties of soil samples repacked from aggregate beds and the potential for retrieving representative soil pore properties at the field scale based on shrinkage analysis of a repacked composite sample. This approach was tested on 60 arable fields in Switzerland presenting a large range of soil organic carbon (SOC) and texture. Soil cores constituted from composite samples were repacked at the observed field bulk density. Their pore properties were compared to undisturbed soil samples from the same fields. The soil pore properties were characterized using shrinkage analysis and correlated to soil texture and SOC. The repacking protocol successfully recreated structured samples. The <40‐µm equivalent diameter pore and structural pore size distributions were comparable to those of the undisturbed soils. For pores >40 µm, a larger porosity was measured for repacked samples compared to undisturbed ones, limiting the approach to assess the structure and dynamics of larger soil pores. Furthermore, soil clay content as well as SOC were strong predictors for the samples’ physical properties including pore space. The increase in structural porosity in the repacked sample was inversely proportional to the structural porosity already present in the undisturbed samples. Steeper regression slopes of the pore volume to SOC or clay relationship were observed for the repacked samples. These slope changes were comparable to those observed in soil structure restoration experiments and opposite to those observed in soil compaction trials. We conclude that repacking soil from a composite sample allows us to characterize the potential soil structure condition with respect to its SOC and clay content. The method can be used to assess soil structure quality in response to changes in soil management.

Soil Science Society of America JournalVol. 89(2)
HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland (CH), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), ETH Zurich (CH), Agroscope (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.