Disparities in overall survival of gastric cancer patients after radical gastrectomy: an age and rural-urban residence-based cohort study with propensity score matching analysis

This study estimated overall survival (OS) among gastric cancer patients stratified by age and rural-urban residence after radical gastrectomy. Patients (n = 286) undergoing curative gastrectomy were categorized into four groups based on age (older ≥ 60 years or younger < 60 years) and residence (rural or urban), including rural older (G1), urban older (G2), rural younger (G3) and urban younger (G4) groups. G1 presented with significantly more males, upper stomach cancers and total gastrectomies, while less patients receiving ≥ 4 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. The 5-year OS rates were 39.9% for G1, 61.1% for G2, 73.1% for G3, and 71.2% for G4, with a median OS of 47 months in G1 and not reached for other groups. OS was significantly worse in G1 than other groups (P < 0.05). Multivariate Cox regression identified age, type of gastrectomy, adjuvant chemotherapy, perineural invasion, pT category and pN category as independent prognostic factors. After propensity score matching, rural older patients continued to show significantly inferior OS compared to urban older (hazard ratio = 2.269 [1.274-4.042], P = 0.005) and rural younger (hazard ratio = 2.103 [1.116-3.961], P = 0.021) patients. Rural older patients suffered poorer OS after radical gastrectomy, highlighting the need for special attention and comprehensive treatment strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-93463-x
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disparities in overall survival of gastric cancer patients after radical gastrectomy: an age and rural-urban residence-based cohort study with propensity score matching analysis

D B Zhou, Fu‐Qian He, Xiaohong Chen, Rui Xu et al.
4 citations
Scientific Reports
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
6.07
article

Disparities in overall survival of gastric cancer patients after radical gastrectomy: an age and rural-urban residence-based cohort study with propensity score matching analysis

D B Zhou, Fu‐Qian He, Xiaohong Chen, Rui Xu, Zhou Xiang
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This study estimated overall survival (OS) among gastric cancer patients stratified by age and rural-urban residence after radical gastrectomy. Patients (n = 286) undergoing curative gastrectomy were categorized into four groups based on age (older ≥ 60 years or younger < 60 years) and residence (rural or urban), including rural older (G1), urban older (G2), rural younger (G3) and urban younger (G4) groups. G1 presented with significantly more males, upper stomach cancers and total gastrectomies, while less patients receiving ≥ 4 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. The 5-year OS rates were 39.9% for G1, 61.1% for G2, 73.1% for G3, and 71.2% for G4, with a median OS of 47 months in G1 and not reached for other groups. OS was significantly worse in G1 than other groups (P < 0.05). Multivariate Cox regression identified age, type of gastrectomy, adjuvant chemotherapy, perineural invasion, pT category and pN category as independent prognostic factors. After propensity score matching, rural older patients continued to show significantly inferior OS compared to urban older (hazard ratio = 2.269 [1.274-4.042], P = 0.005) and rural younger (hazard ratio = 2.103 [1.116-3.961], P = 0.021) patients. Rural older patients suffered poorer OS after radical gastrectomy, highlighting the need for special attention and comprehensive treatment strategies.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN), Sichuan University (CN), Sichuan Cancer Hospital (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
6.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.