Characterization of diverse Cas9 orthologs for genome and epigenome editing
CRISPR-Cas9 systems have revolutionized biotechnology, creating diverse new opportunities for biomedical research and therapeutic genome and epigenome editing. Despite the abundance of bacterial CRISPR-Cas9 systems, relatively few are effective in human cells, limiting the overall potential of CRISPR technology. To expand the CRISPR-Cas toolbox, we characterized a set of type II CRISPR-Cas9 systems from select bacterial genera and species encoding diverse Cas9s. Four systems demonstrated robust and specific gene repression in human cells when used as nuclease-null dCas9s fused with a KRAB domain and were also highly active nucleases in human cells. These systems have distinct protospacer adjacent motifs (PAMs), including AT-rich motifs and sgRNA features orthogonal to the commonly used <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and <i>Streptococcus pyogenes</i> Cas9s. Additionally, we assessed gene activation when fused with the p300 catalytic domain. Notably, <i>S. uberis</i> Cas9 performed competitively against benchmarks with promising repression, activation, nuclease, and base editing activity. This study expands the CRISPR-Cas9 repertoire, enabling effective genome and epigenome editing for diverse applications.
Authors
- Daniel J. Morone
- Matthew A. Nethery (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2959-620X)
- Lisa Garnier
- Avery Roberts (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1893-9599)
- Dahlia Rohm
- Nahid Iglesias
- Gabriel L. Butterfield (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6825-6286)
- Rodolphe Barrangou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0648-3504)
- Anthony Rizzo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2170-6988)
- Charles A. Gersbach
Institutions
- North Carolina State University (US)
- Duke University (US)
- Genetic Technologies (Australia) (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2025-03-12
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2417674122
- Citations
- 7
- Primary Topic
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 5.64
Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Open Philanthropy Project
- National Institutes of Health
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
- Defense Sciences Office, DARPA