The Irreducibility of Consciousness in Human Intelligence: Implications for AI, Legal Accountability, and the Human-in-the-Loop Approach

This paper proposes a framework that adapts irreducible consciousness to govern human-AI co-design, positioning consciousness as central to intelligence. Drawing insights from quantum mechanics, infant cognitive development, the limbic system, and the philosophical hard problem of consciousness, we explore the implications of consciousness for human-AI codesigns. We address legal complexities, such as interpreting mens rea (guilty mind) in AI-mediated actions, especially as AI, neurotechnology, and brain-computer interfaces (BCI) increasingly blur distinctions between human volition and AI behaviours. Our model identifies principles of mind and core mental fac-tors-consciousness, feeling, perception, volition, contact, and attention-and aligns them with brain data using BCI. Through the Markov Decision Process (MDP) framework, we integrate BCI brain data with behavioural and contextual information to strengthen human oversight and reinforce the human-in-the-loop paradigm in human-AI co-design. This framework suggests a need for evolved ethical and legal accountability approaches to address the complex realities of human-AI collaboration.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icei64305.2024.10912272
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Irreducibility of Consciousness in Human Intelligence: Implications for AI, Legal Accountability, and the Human-in-the-Loop Approach

Mahendra Samarawickrama
2 citations
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
1.05
article

The Irreducibility of Consciousness in Human Intelligence: Implications for AI, Legal Accountability, and the Human-in-the-Loop Approach

Mahendra Samarawickrama
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper proposes a framework that adapts irreducible consciousness to govern human-AI co-design, positioning consciousness as central to intelligence. Drawing insights from quantum mechanics, infant cognitive development, the limbic system, and the philosophical hard problem of consciousness, we explore the implications of consciousness for human-AI codesigns. We address legal complexities, such as interpreting mens rea (guilty mind) in AI-mediated actions, especially as AI, neurotechnology, and brain-computer interfaces (BCI) increasingly blur distinctions between human volition and AI behaviours. Our model identifies principles of mind and core mental fac-tors-consciousness, feeling, perception, volition, contact, and attention-and aligns them with brain data using BCI. Through the Markov Decision Process (MDP) framework, we integrate BCI brain data with behavioural and contextual information to strengthen human oversight and reinforce the human-in-the-loop paradigm in human-AI co-design. This framework suggests a need for evolved ethical and legal accountability approaches to address the complex realities of human-AI collaboration.

Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.