Reporting online abuse to platforms: Factors, interfaces and the potential for care

Evidence suggests that the rate of reporting abuse, harassment and problematic content to platforms is substantially low. This article assesses the extent to which platform interfaces may contribute to discouraging the use of reporting as a remedy to online harms. Using a walkthrough method, we analyse reporting interfaces for the extent to which they may contribute to a lack of trust in reporting. The study found that reporting interfaces (1) did not provide appropriate access to platform policy or guidelines, (2) failed to provide options for dialogue, testimonials or mechanisms to report in formats supporting user wellbeing needs, (3) were consistently framed as individualising and transactional rather than brokering care or peer support, and (4) added to the opacity of platform intervention and decision-making processes. We argue the available interfaces do not do enough to protect users from digital harms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies
Published
2025-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565251324508
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reporting online abuse to platforms: Factors, interfaces and the potential for care

Benedetta Brevini, Rhyle Simcock, Jennifer Beckett, Jay Daniel Thompson et al.
3 citations
Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
7.44
article

Reporting online abuse to platforms: Factors, interfaces and the potential for care

Benedetta Brevini, Rhyle Simcock, Jennifer Beckett, Jay Daniel Thompson, Rob Cover, Catharine Lumby
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Evidence suggests that the rate of reporting abuse, harassment and problematic content to platforms is substantially low. This article assesses the extent to which platform interfaces may contribute to discouraging the use of reporting as a remedy to online harms. Using a walkthrough method, we analyse reporting interfaces for the extent to which they may contribute to a lack of trust in reporting. The study found that reporting interfaces (1) did not provide appropriate access to platform policy or guidelines, (2) failed to provide options for dialogue, testimonials or mechanisms to report in formats supporting user wellbeing needs, (3) were consistently framed as individualising and transactional rather than brokering care or peer support, and (4) added to the opacity of platform intervention and decision-making processes. We argue the available interfaces do not do enough to protect users from digital harms.

Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media TechnologiesVol. 32(1)
The University of Sydney (AU), Queensland University of Technology (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), MIT University (MK), RMIT University (AU)
Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
7.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reporting online abuse to platforms: Factors, interfaces and the potential for care — Benedetta Brevini, Rhyle Simcock, et al. · Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS