The feminine of Cicero: Anthony Trollope’s classical critique of Victorian masculinity

Abstract When the Victorian novelist Anthony Trollope, famous for his tales of contemporary British life, published a biography of Cicero in 1880, he surprised and dismayed many critics: the work has often been labelled an unscholarly failure. My study, by contrast, argues for the value of Trollope’s biography as a bold critique of Victorian masculinity which rejects the ubiquitous idealization of toughness and emotional restraint. I begin by establishing the central importance of emotional suppression to Victorian conceptions of masculinity. The article then explores how Victorian histories of ancient Rome created a Caesar–Cicero dichotomy which elevated Caesar’s hard-hearted, militaristic manliness over Cicero’s sensitiveness. The final section demonstrates how Trollope presented Cicero as an alternative to dominant conceptions of manliness, a great statesman who revelled in his passions. Trollope’s celebration of Ciceronian emotion is no amateurish vanity project, but a thoughtful ethical manifesto and a precursor to modern research on the history of the emotions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Classical Receptions Journal
Published
2025-02-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/crj/clae020
Primary Topic
Literature: history, themes, analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The feminine of Cicero: Anthony Trollope’s classical critique of Victorian masculinity

Jessica Glueck
Classical Receptions Journal
Literature: history, themes, analysis
article

The feminine of Cicero: Anthony Trollope’s classical critique of Victorian masculinity

Jessica Glueck
article en

Abstract

Abstract When the Victorian novelist Anthony Trollope, famous for his tales of contemporary British life, published a biography of Cicero in 1880, he surprised and dismayed many critics: the work has often been labelled an unscholarly failure. My study, by contrast, argues for the value of Trollope’s biography as a bold critique of Victorian masculinity which rejects the ubiquitous idealization of toughness and emotional restraint. I begin by establishing the central importance of emotional suppression to Victorian conceptions of masculinity. The article then explores how Victorian histories of ancient Rome created a Caesar–Cicero dichotomy which elevated Caesar’s hard-hearted, militaristic manliness over Cicero’s sensitiveness. The final section demonstrates how Trollope presented Cicero as an alternative to dominant conceptions of manliness, a great statesman who revelled in his passions. Trollope’s celebration of Ciceronian emotion is no amateurish vanity project, but a thoughtful ethical manifesto and a precursor to modern research on the history of the emotions.

Classical Receptions JournalVol. 17(2)
University of Cambridge (GB), Bridge University (SS)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Literature: history, themes, analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.