Wetland plant growth in recycled glass sand versus dredged river sand: evaluating a new resource for coastal restoration

Sand made from recycled glass cullet could supplement limited dredged river sand (dredge) in coastal wetland restorations; however, its suitability for wetland plants is unknown. In two experiments, we compared the biomass of several wetland plants in recycled glass sand to growth in dredge. First, we grew Salix nigra , Zizaniopsis miliacea , and Sporobolus alterniflorus in fine‐ and coarse‐glass sands, dredge, and a coarse‐glass/dredge mixture. Second, we grew Taxodium distichum and Schoenoplectus californicus in a revised coarse‐glass blend, dredge, and a mix. We characterized the substrate porosity, particle density, and bulk density for both experiments and tested how substrate nutrients, metals, and pH impacted S. californicus leaf contents. We found species‐specific responses to substrates: herbaceous species grew better in the mix and dredge than in glass alone, whereas trees grew equally well in the coarse glass, mix, and dredge. Glass sand was less dense than dredge. When saturated and compressed, finer‐grained glass sand and mixes had lower estimated porosities than coarser glass sand and dredge. S. californicus leaf chemistry resembled that of the plant's substrate. This study demonstrated that wetland plants can grow in glass sand, that mixtures of glass and dredge have species‐specific effects, and that substrate structure and chemistry could help explain these differences. Thus, it opens the door for broader field studies on how glass sand can best be used in coastal restoration efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Restoration Ecology
Published
2025-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.70020
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wetland plant growth in recycled glass sand versus dredged river sand: evaluating a new resource for coastal restoration

Julie Albert, Sunshine A. Van Bael, Sabarinah Sh Ahmad, Emily C. Farrer et al.
4 citations
Restoration Ecology
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
6.87
article

Wetland plant growth in recycled glass sand versus dredged river sand: evaluating a new resource for coastal restoration

Julie Albert, Sunshine A. Van Bael, Sabarinah Sh Ahmad, Emily C. Farrer, Elizabeth H. MacDougal, Bek X. L. Markel
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Sand made from recycled glass cullet could supplement limited dredged river sand (dredge) in coastal wetland restorations; however, its suitability for wetland plants is unknown. In two experiments, we compared the biomass of several wetland plants in recycled glass sand to growth in dredge. First, we grew Salix nigra , Zizaniopsis miliacea , and Sporobolus alterniflorus in fine‐ and coarse‐glass sands, dredge, and a coarse‐glass/dredge mixture. Second, we grew Taxodium distichum and Schoenoplectus californicus in a revised coarse‐glass blend, dredge, and a mix. We characterized the substrate porosity, particle density, and bulk density for both experiments and tested how substrate nutrients, metals, and pH impacted S. californicus leaf contents. We found species‐specific responses to substrates: herbaceous species grew better in the mix and dredge than in glass alone, whereas trees grew equally well in the coarse glass, mix, and dredge. Glass sand was less dense than dredge. When saturated and compressed, finer‐grained glass sand and mixes had lower estimated porosities than coarser glass sand and dredge. S. californicus leaf chemistry resembled that of the plant's substrate. This study demonstrated that wetland plants can grow in glass sand, that mixtures of glass and dredge have species‐specific effects, and that substrate structure and chemistry could help explain these differences. Thus, it opens the door for broader field studies on how glass sand can best be used in coastal restoration efforts.

Restoration Ecology
Tulane University (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
6.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.