Community and State Violence in Middle Bronze Age Mesopotamia

Abstract Violence stands at the core of many theories about how early societies worked. Assumptions that violence was widely used in both state and private arenas—to regulate competition, enact symbolic orders, and/or manifest “primitive” social forms—are common in many explanations of how state society worked. But an analysis of the forms, representation, and distribution of violence in Mesopotamian Bronze Age cultures shows that state and community violence was rare in fact. Taking into account the literary-generic production of violent imagery, the negative political value of using violence, and the pervasive low-level structural violence of household orders, we conclude that a concern for reputation and potential exclusion from communities were far more powerful forms of policing and sanction than was violence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient
Published
2025-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15685209-12341641
Primary Topic
Ancient Near East History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Community and State Violence in Middle Bronze Age Mesopotamia

Seth Richardson, Steven Garfinkle
Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient
Ancient Near East History
article

Community and State Violence in Middle Bronze Age Mesopotamia

Seth Richardson, Steven Garfinkle
article en

Abstract

Abstract Violence stands at the core of many theories about how early societies worked. Assumptions that violence was widely used in both state and private arenas—to regulate competition, enact symbolic orders, and/or manifest “primitive” social forms—are common in many explanations of how state society worked. But an analysis of the forms, representation, and distribution of violence in Mesopotamian Bronze Age cultures shows that state and community violence was rare in fact. Taking into account the literary-generic production of violent imagery, the negative political value of using violence, and the pervasive low-level structural violence of household orders, we conclude that a concern for reputation and potential exclusion from communities were far more powerful forms of policing and sanction than was violence.

Journal of the Economic and Social History of the OrientVol. 68(1-2)
University of Chicago (US), Western Washington University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Ancient Near East History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.