Xiongnu Rulers’ Residences in the Historical Records of the Han Dynasty

Abstract Han Dynasty chroniclers recorded valuable information about key settlements in the Xiongnu Empire, specifically those where the residence of the Chanyu was located. Though the first nomadic empire’s political centre is linked to theories of early urbanisation in the eastern steppe, detailed examination of the historiographical terminology is lacking. We analyse the terminology to assess how settlements were perceived through the lens of Han culture and language. Six Chinese and two Xiongnu terms describing settlement form or function are identified and compared with form and function of the settlements known from archaeological materials. Some of the terms relate to traditional mobile structures, whereas others attest to substantial earthen structures of unquestionable political and ceremonial import influenced by Han technologies. We also propose a solution to the problem of when and how these technologies were introduced into nomadic society.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient
Published
2025-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15685209-12341640
Primary Topic
Chinese history and philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Xiongnu Rulers’ Residences in the Historical Records of the Han Dynasty

Yury Esin, Rebecca O’Sullivan
Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient
Chinese history and philosophy
article

Xiongnu Rulers’ Residences in the Historical Records of the Han Dynasty

Yury Esin, Rebecca O’Sullivan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Han Dynasty chroniclers recorded valuable information about key settlements in the Xiongnu Empire, specifically those where the residence of the Chanyu was located. Though the first nomadic empire’s political centre is linked to theories of early urbanisation in the eastern steppe, detailed examination of the historiographical terminology is lacking. We analyse the terminology to assess how settlements were perceived through the lens of Han culture and language. Six Chinese and two Xiongnu terms describing settlement form or function are identified and compared with form and function of the settlements known from archaeological materials. Some of the terms relate to traditional mobile structures, whereas others attest to substantial earthen structures of unquestionable political and ceremonial import influenced by Han technologies. We also propose a solution to the problem of when and how these technologies were introduced into nomadic society.

Journal of the Economic and Social History of the OrientVol. 68(1-2)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Liverpool (GB), Université de Bourgogne (FR)
Gerda Henkel Foundation
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Chinese history and philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.