Efficient and Effective Model Extraction

Model extraction aims to steal a functionally similar copy from a machine learning as a service (MLaaS) API with minimal overhead, typically for illicit profit or as a precursor to further attacks, posing a significant threat to the MLaaS ecosystem. However, recent studies have shown that model extraction is highly inefficient, particularly when the target task distribution is unavailable. In such cases, even substantially increasing the attack budget fails to produce a sufficiently similar replica, reducing the adversary’s motivation to pursue extraction attacks. In this paper, we revisit the elementary design choices throughout the extraction lifecycle. We propose an embarrassingly simple yet dramatically effective algorithm, Efficient and Effective Model Extraction (E<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">3</sup>), focusing on both query preparation and training routine. E<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">3</sup> achieves superior generalization compared to state-of-the-art methods while minimizing computational costs. For instance, with only 0.005× the query budget and less than 0.2× the runtime, E<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">3</sup> outperforms classical generative model based data-free model extraction by an absolute accuracy improvement of over 50% on CIFAR-10. Our findings underscore the persistent threat posed by model extraction and suggest that it could serve as a valuable benchmarking algorithm for future security evaluations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icassp49660.2025.10887780
Primary Topic
Neural Networks and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficient and Effective Model Extraction

Fangqi Li, Wentao Hu, Hongyu Zhu, Shilin Wang et al.
Neural Networks and Applications
article

Efficient and Effective Model Extraction

Fangqi Li, Wentao Hu, Hongyu Zhu, Shilin Wang, Shuai Liang, Wenwen Wang
article en

Abstract

Model extraction aims to steal a functionally similar copy from a machine learning as a service (MLaaS) API with minimal overhead, typically for illicit profit or as a precursor to further attacks, posing a significant threat to the MLaaS ecosystem. However, recent studies have shown that model extraction is highly inefficient, particularly when the target task distribution is unavailable. In such cases, even substantially increasing the attack budget fails to produce a sufficiently similar replica, reducing the adversary’s motivation to pursue extraction attacks. In this paper, we revisit the elementary design choices throughout the extraction lifecycle. We propose an embarrassingly simple yet dramatically effective algorithm, Efficient and Effective Model Extraction (E<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">3</sup>), focusing on both query preparation and training routine. E<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">3</sup> achieves superior generalization compared to state-of-the-art methods while minimizing computational costs. For instance, with only 0.005× the query budget and less than 0.2× the runtime, E<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">3</sup> outperforms classical generative model based data-free model extraction by an absolute accuracy improvement of over 50% on CIFAR-10. Our findings underscore the persistent threat posed by model extraction and suggest that it could serve as a valuable benchmarking algorithm for future security evaluations.

Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Carnegie Mellon University (US), Southeast University (CN)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Neural Networks and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.