Identifying and Mitigating Mismatched Language Code in Multilingual ASR

Multilingual speech recognition systems often use an input language code in order to prompt the transcription in the target language. However, the spoken language in the input audio may not always match the language code, as often prevalent in multilingual societies. This language mismatch can significantly reduce ASR quality. We present a technique to identify and mitigate this issue. We combine off-the-shelf language-ID and language verification models to determine the language code input to the ASR model. The language verification model acts as a gate that decides when to trust the provided language code or use the output of the language-ID model. We compare these approaches with baselines that include vanilla language-ID based and language-independent ASR models. Our experiments on YouTube, SPRING-INX and FLEURS datasets shows the efficacy of the proposed model especially in the mismatched language code setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icassp49660.2025.10887912
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Speech and dialogue systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying and Mitigating Mismatched Language Code in Multilingual ASR

Sriram Ganapathy, Kartik Audhkhasi, Sepand Mavandadi, Shikhar Bharadwaj et al.
1 citations
Speech and dialogue systems
2.48
article

Identifying and Mitigating Mismatched Language Code in Multilingual ASR

Sriram Ganapathy, Kartik Audhkhasi, Sepand Mavandadi, Shikhar Bharadwaj, Brian Farris, Bhuvana Ramabhadran, Tongzhou Chen, Jaeyoung Kim
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Multilingual speech recognition systems often use an input language code in order to prompt the transcription in the target language. However, the spoken language in the input audio may not always match the language code, as often prevalent in multilingual societies. This language mismatch can significantly reduce ASR quality. We present a technique to identify and mitigate this issue. We combine off-the-shelf language-ID and language verification models to determine the language code input to the ASR model. The language verification model acts as a gate that decides when to trust the provided language code or use the output of the language-ID model. We compare these approaches with baselines that include vanilla language-ID based and language-independent ASR models. Our experiments on YouTube, SPRING-INX and FLEURS datasets shows the efficacy of the proposed model especially in the mismatched language code setting.

Google (United States) (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Speech and dialogue systems
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.