Exploring the Differences between Deaf and Hearing Infant Cries

In this study, we propose an interpretable AI approach for analyzing infant cry signals, focusing on distinguishing between deaf and hearing infants. Using the Baby Chillanto dataset, we first conduct a human test to determine how well humans can detect the differences between hearing and deaf infants. We then explore the use of typical features used in audio signal analysis - chromagram, Log-Mel spectrogram and Mel frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCC), to determine whether a deep learning model can perform as well or better than humans. To explain the model’s predictions, we apply SHapley Additive exPlanations(SHAP) which reveal the most significant portion of each feature set that contributes to the model’s decisions. This interpretable approach provides valuable insights into how acoustic characteristics differ between deaf and hearing infants, potentially aiding early detection and understanding of hearing impairments through non-invasive cry signal analysis. While the combined human test results were near random, our deep learning approach demonstrated both high classification performance and enhanced explainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icassp49660.2025.10888707
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Infant Health and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Differences between Deaf and Hearing Infant Cries

Ifeoma Nwogu, Enjamamul Hoq
2 citations
Infant Health and Development
4.04
article

Exploring the Differences between Deaf and Hearing Infant Cries

Ifeoma Nwogu, Enjamamul Hoq
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In this study, we propose an interpretable AI approach for analyzing infant cry signals, focusing on distinguishing between deaf and hearing infants. Using the Baby Chillanto dataset, we first conduct a human test to determine how well humans can detect the differences between hearing and deaf infants. We then explore the use of typical features used in audio signal analysis - chromagram, Log-Mel spectrogram and Mel frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCC), to determine whether a deep learning model can perform as well or better than humans. To explain the model’s predictions, we apply SHapley Additive exPlanations(SHAP) which reveal the most significant portion of each feature set that contributes to the model’s decisions. This interpretable approach provides valuable insights into how acoustic characteristics differ between deaf and hearing infants, potentially aiding early detection and understanding of hearing impairments through non-invasive cry signal analysis. While the combined human test results were near random, our deep learning approach demonstrated both high classification performance and enhanced explainability.

University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Infant Health and Development
4.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring the Differences between Deaf and Hearing Infant Cries — Ifeoma Nwogu, Enjamamul Hoq · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS