Same Semantics of the Signal - What Do We Cluster with what Representation

Semantic clustering of bioacoustic signals is crucial for a deeper understanding of intra-class differences. This is particularly important for understanding killer whale signals, as their vocalizations are learned behaviors and determination of matrilineal-specific dialects is reliant upon subtle differences within instances which may be characterized into a single larger category. Aspects of data collection may have an effect on how these calls are grouped, and it is therefore necessary to understand what the focus of the feature generation algorithm is. This study addresses the impact of factors such as recording conditions and environment, together with its respective relative noise levels, by first analyzing two different deep learning and data-driven feature representations, either derived by an undercomplete autoencoder or a supervised call type classifier. These are then compared with representations generated by two state-of-the-art transformer-based tools, namely HuBERT and Wav2Vec2.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icassp49660.2025.10889674
Primary Topic
Neural Networks and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Same Semantics of the Signal - What Do We Cluster with what Representation

Christian Bergler, Elmar Nöth, Alexander Barnhill, Andreas Maier et al.
Neural Networks and Applications
article

Same Semantics of the Signal - What Do We Cluster with what Representation

Christian Bergler, Elmar Nöth, Alexander Barnhill, Andreas Maier, Oliver Traub
article en

Abstract

Semantic clustering of bioacoustic signals is crucial for a deeper understanding of intra-class differences. This is particularly important for understanding killer whale signals, as their vocalizations are learned behaviors and determination of matrilineal-specific dialects is reliant upon subtle differences within instances which may be characterized into a single larger category. Aspects of data collection may have an effect on how these calls are grouped, and it is therefore necessary to understand what the focus of the feature generation algorithm is. This study addresses the impact of factors such as recording conditions and environment, together with its respective relative noise levels, by first analyzing two different deep learning and data-driven feature representations, either derived by an undercomplete autoencoder or a supervised call type classifier. These are then compared with representations generated by two state-of-the-art transformer-based tools, namely HuBERT and Wav2Vec2.

Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Amberg-Weiden (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Neural Networks and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Same Semantics of the Signal - What Do We Cluster with what Representation — Christian Bergler, Elmar Nöth, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS