What Does an Audio Deepfake Detector Focus on? A Study in the Time Domain

Adding explanations to audio deepfake detection (ADD) models will enable insights on the decision making process and thus boost their real-world application. In this paper, we propose a relevancy-based explainable AI (XAI) method to analyze the predictions of transformer-based ADD models. We compare against standard Grad-CAM and SHAP-based methods, using quantitative faithfulness metrics as well as a partial spoof test, to comprehensively analyze the relative importance of different temporal regions in an audio. We consider large datasets, unlike previous works where only limited utterances are studied, and find that the XAI methods differ in their explanations. The proposed relevancy-based XAI method performs the best overall on a variety of metrics. Further investigation on the relative importance of speech/non-speech, phonetic content, and voice onsets/offsets suggests that the XAI results obtained from a limited set of utterances do not necessarily hold when evaluated on large datasets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icassp49660.2025.10887568
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Music and Audio Processing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.94
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Does an Audio Deepfake Detector Focus on? A Study in the Time Domain

Gaurav Bharaj, Petr Grinberg, Surya Koppisetti, Ankur Kumar
4 citations
Music and Audio Processing
5.94
article

What Does an Audio Deepfake Detector Focus on? A Study in the Time Domain

Gaurav Bharaj, Petr Grinberg, Surya Koppisetti, Ankur Kumar
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Adding explanations to audio deepfake detection (ADD) models will enable insights on the decision making process and thus boost their real-world application. In this paper, we propose a relevancy-based explainable AI (XAI) method to analyze the predictions of transformer-based ADD models. We compare against standard Grad-CAM and SHAP-based methods, using quantitative faithfulness metrics as well as a partial spoof test, to comprehensively analyze the relative importance of different temporal regions in an audio. We consider large datasets, unlike previous works where only limited utterances are studied, and find that the XAI methods differ in their explanations. The proposed relevancy-based XAI method performs the best overall on a variety of metrics. Further investigation on the relative importance of speech/non-speech, phonetic content, and voice onsets/offsets suggests that the XAI results obtained from a limited set of utterances do not necessarily hold when evaluated on large datasets.

Division of Public Defender Services (US), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Music and Audio Processing
5.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What Does an Audio Deepfake Detector Focus on? A Study in the Time Domain — Gaurav Bharaj, Petr Grinberg, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS