Out-of-Distribution Detectors: Not Yet Primed for Practical Deployment

Out-of-distribution (OoD) detectors work alongside deep neural networks (DNNs) to reduce their risks in eliciting wrong predictions. Unfortunately, OoD detectors built on data-centric designs are also subject to robustness issues, as the DNNs. This paper examines the practical robustness of OoD detectors, taking computer vision tasks as examples and considering natural input perturbations that may come from camera positions and lighting conditions. Our study incorporates extensive experiments over 2000+ settings and correlation studies, highlighting significant challenges in OoD detection robustness, e.g., OoD detectors’ robustness error rate in practical settings can be as high as 28%. The paper advances our understanding of OoD detectors’ applicability in real world and the interplay of their robustness with DNNs’ robustness, calling for novel methodology to design robust OoD detectors in broader signal processing tasks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icassp49660.2025.10888258
Primary Topic
Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Out-of-Distribution Detectors: Not Yet Primed for Practical Deployment

Xiaowei Huang, Changshun Wu, Saddek Bensalem, W. M. Ding
Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring
article

Out-of-Distribution Detectors: Not Yet Primed for Practical Deployment

Xiaowei Huang, Changshun Wu, Saddek Bensalem, W. M. Ding
article en

Abstract

Out-of-distribution (OoD) detectors work alongside deep neural networks (DNNs) to reduce their risks in eliciting wrong predictions. Unfortunately, OoD detectors built on data-centric designs are also subject to robustness issues, as the DNNs. This paper examines the practical robustness of OoD detectors, taking computer vision tasks as examples and considering natural input perturbations that may come from camera positions and lighting conditions. Our study incorporates extensive experiments over 2000+ settings and correlation studies, highlighting significant challenges in OoD detection robustness, e.g., OoD detectors’ robustness error rate in practical settings can be as high as 28%. The paper advances our understanding of OoD detectors’ applicability in real world and the interplay of their robustness with DNNs’ robustness, calling for novel methodology to design robust OoD detectors in broader signal processing tasks.

University of Liverpool (GB), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Out-of-Distribution Detectors: Not Yet Primed for Practical Deployment — Xiaowei Huang, Changshun Wu, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS