L <sup>2</sup> · M = C <sup>2</sup> Large Language Models Are Covert Channels

Large Language Models (LLMs) are susceptible to various attacks but can also improve the security of diverse systems. However, how well do open source LLMs behave as covertext distributions to, e.g., facilitate censorship-resistant communication? In this paper, we explore open-source LLM-based covert channels. We empirically measure the security vs. capacity of two open-source LLM models (Llama-7B and GPT-2) to assess their performance as covert channels. Although our results indicate that such channels are not likely to achieve high practical bitrates, we also show that the chance for an adversary to detect covert communication is low. To ensure our results can be used with the least effort as a general reference, we employ a conceptually simple and concise scheme and only assume public models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icassp49660.2025.10887756
Primary Topic
Authorship Attribution and Profiling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

L 2 · M = C 2 Large Language Models Are Covert Channels

Stjepan Picek, Simen Gaure, Sondre Rønjom, Stefanos Koffas
Authorship Attribution and Profiling
article

L 2 · M = C 2 Large Language Models Are Covert Channels

Stjepan Picek, Simen Gaure, Sondre Rønjom, Stefanos Koffas
article en

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are susceptible to various attacks but can also improve the security of diverse systems. However, how well do open source LLMs behave as covertext distributions to, e.g., facilitate censorship-resistant communication? In this paper, we explore open-source LLM-based covert channels. We empirically measure the security vs. capacity of two open-source LLM models (Llama-7B and GPT-2) to assess their performance as covert channels. Although our results indicate that such channels are not likely to achieve high practical bitrates, we also show that the chance for an adversary to detect covert communication is low. To ensure our results can be used with the least effort as a general reference, we employ a conceptually simple and concise scheme and only assume public models.

Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Delft University of Technology (NL)
The Research Council, Norges Forskningsråd
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Authorship Attribution and Profiling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.