Efficacy and Safety of Pharmacotherapy in Cancer-Related Anorexia and Cachexia Symptoms: An Updated Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Cancer-associated cachexia syndrome (CACS) is a complex condition characterized by anorexia, weight loss, and muscle wasting, significantly affecting quality of life and treatment outcomes. The comparative efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatments remain uncertain. Methods: A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted using randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Three databases were searched for studies published between 2000 and 2024. The analyzed outcomes included absolute weight gain, improvement in the anorexia-cachexia subscore (ACS), and the risk of serious adverse events (AEs). Results: Nine studies involving 1,505 participants were analyzed. Olanzapine demonstrated the most significant weight gain (MD 4.6 kg, 95% CI: 0.82–8.38), while ponsegromab 400 mg and anamorelin 100 mg were effective in maintaining weight, with gains of 3.26 kg (95% CI: 2.35–4.17) and 2.38 kg (95% CI: 1.82–2.94), respectively. However, the network meta-analysis did not confirm the superiority of olanzapine over ponsegromab or anamorelin. Mirtazapine showed limited benefits in weight gain. Regarding ACS, olanzapine demonstrated the highest efficacy, with significant improvement compared to ponsegromab 400 mg (MD 6.5, 95% CI: 1.3–11.7), anamorelin 100 mg (MD 6.9, 95% CI: 1.6–12.1), mirtazapine 15 mg (MD 10.0, 95% CI: 5.8–14.2), ponsegromab 200 mg (MD 10.3, 95% CI: 6.1–14.5), and anamorelin 50 mg (MD 10.3, 95% CI: 5.1–15.4), confirming its superior ACS improvement through network meta-analysis. All but mirtazapine showed acceptable safety profiles, with serious AEs (odds ratio: 5.93, 95% CI: 2.35–14.96). Only mirtazapine showed an increased risk of serious AEs with an odds ratio of 5.93 (95% CI: 2.35–14.96). Conclusions: Olanzapine demonstrated notable benefits in weight gain and ACS improvement with a favorable safety profile while emerging agents like anamorelin and ponsegromab show promise in managing CACS.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Question
Published
2025-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69854/jcq.2025.0004
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and Safety of Pharmacotherapy in Cancer-Related Anorexia and Cachexia Symptoms: An Updated Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Jyoti Bajpai, Pankaj Soni, Noah Kim, Kush Shah et al.
Journal of Clinical Question
Nutrition and Health in Aging
article

Efficacy and Safety of Pharmacotherapy in Cancer-Related Anorexia and Cachexia Symptoms: An Updated Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Jyoti Bajpai, Pankaj Soni, Noah Kim, Kush Shah, A Brar
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Cancer-associated cachexia syndrome (CACS) is a complex condition characterized by anorexia, weight loss, and muscle wasting, significantly affecting quality of life and treatment outcomes. The comparative efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatments remain uncertain. Methods: A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted using randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Three databases were searched for studies published between 2000 and 2024. The analyzed outcomes included absolute weight gain, improvement in the anorexia-cachexia subscore (ACS), and the risk of serious adverse events (AEs). Results: Nine studies involving 1,505 participants were analyzed. Olanzapine demonstrated the most significant weight gain (MD 4.6 kg, 95% CI: 0.82–8.38), while ponsegromab 400 mg and anamorelin 100 mg were effective in maintaining weight, with gains of 3.26 kg (95% CI: 2.35–4.17) and 2.38 kg (95% CI: 1.82–2.94), respectively. However, the network meta-analysis did not confirm the superiority of olanzapine over ponsegromab or anamorelin. Mirtazapine showed limited benefits in weight gain. Regarding ACS, olanzapine demonstrated the highest efficacy, with significant improvement compared to ponsegromab 400 mg (MD 6.5, 95% CI: 1.3–11.7), anamorelin 100 mg (MD 6.9, 95% CI: 1.6–12.1), mirtazapine 15 mg (MD 10.0, 95% CI: 5.8–14.2), ponsegromab 200 mg (MD 10.3, 95% CI: 6.1–14.5), and anamorelin 50 mg (MD 10.3, 95% CI: 5.1–15.4), confirming its superior ACS improvement through network meta-analysis. All but mirtazapine showed acceptable safety profiles, with serious AEs (odds ratio: 5.93, 95% CI: 2.35–14.96). Only mirtazapine showed an increased risk of serious AEs with an odds ratio of 5.93 (95% CI: 2.35–14.96). Conclusions: Olanzapine demonstrated notable benefits in weight gain and ACS improvement with a favorable safety profile while emerging agents like anamorelin and ponsegromab show promise in managing CACS.

Journal of Clinical QuestionVol. 2(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.