A Comparative Study on “Over” in English.

The purpose of present paper This study examined the usage patterns of the English preposition “over,” as produced by native speakers and Korean learners of English. Data from COCA and KLCE were analyzed, focusing on eight key semantic categories, including physical position/movement, control/authority, and comparison/superiority. The findings revealed significant differences between the two groups: Native speakers employ “over” flexibly across a wide range of categories, demonstrating its use in both literal and abstract contexts. In contrast, Korean learners display a strong reliance on the spatial meaning of “over,” with limited application in abstract categories. A χ² test confirmed the statistical significance of these differences, and the Cramér’s V of 0.195 indicated a moderate association between group membership and usage patterns. These results underscore the impact of L1 influence on prepositional usage and suggest that Korean learners will benefit from targeted instruction focusing on the metaphorical and abstract meanings of “over.” The paper concludes with pedagogical recommendations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Linguistic Studies
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21291/jkals.2024.29.3.1
Primary Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study on “Over” in English.

Taejin Kim, Shinjae Park
2 links
Journal of Linguistic Studies
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
article

A Comparative Study on “Over” in English.

Taejin Kim, Shinjae Park
article en

Abstract

The purpose of present paper This study examined the usage patterns of the English preposition “over,” as produced by native speakers and Korean learners of English. Data from COCA and KLCE were analyzed, focusing on eight key semantic categories, including physical position/movement, control/authority, and comparison/superiority. The findings revealed significant differences between the two groups: Native speakers employ “over” flexibly across a wide range of categories, demonstrating its use in both literal and abstract contexts. In contrast, Korean learners display a strong reliance on the spatial meaning of “over,” with limited application in abstract categories. A χ² test confirmed the statistical significance of these differences, and the Cramér’s V of 0.195 indicated a moderate association between group membership and usage patterns. These results underscore the impact of L1 influence on prepositional usage and suggest that Korean learners will benefit from targeted instruction focusing on the metaphorical and abstract meanings of “over.” The paper concludes with pedagogical recommendations.

Journal of Linguistic StudiesVol. 29(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparative Study on “Over” in English. — Taejin Kim, Shinjae Park · Journal of Linguistic Studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS