Investigating the perceptions of self‐efficacy of in‐field and out‐of‐field home economics teachers

Abstract Out‐of‐field teaching is a strategy employed to address global teacher shortages. This study compares Australian in‐field and out‐of‐field teacher effectiveness perceptions when teaching home economics. An online survey ( N = 194) identified statistically significant findings that negatively impact the subject, teachers, and students: in‐field teachers report they are more effective than out‐of‐field teachers, while out‐of‐field teachers claim they are equally effective; in‐field and out‐of‐field teachers report declines in self‐efficacy and well‐being when teaching out‐of‐field; out‐of‐field teachers use narrower subject skills, safety, and knowledge. Professional learning, skill development, resource provision, support/mentoring, planning time, and strategic hiring are suggested to address out‐of‐field teaching challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/fcsr.70006
Primary Topic
Diverse Education Studies and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the perceptions of self‐efficacy of in‐field and out‐of‐field home economics teachers

Jay Deagon, Sarah McManus, Donna Pendergast, Anna Elizabeth Du Plessis
Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal
Diverse Education Studies and Reforms
article

Investigating the perceptions of self‐efficacy of in‐field and out‐of‐field home economics teachers

Jay Deagon, Sarah McManus, Donna Pendergast, Anna Elizabeth Du Plessis
article en

Abstract

Abstract Out‐of‐field teaching is a strategy employed to address global teacher shortages. This study compares Australian in‐field and out‐of‐field teacher effectiveness perceptions when teaching home economics. An online survey ( N = 194) identified statistically significant findings that negatively impact the subject, teachers, and students: in‐field teachers report they are more effective than out‐of‐field teachers, while out‐of‐field teachers claim they are equally effective; in‐field and out‐of‐field teachers report declines in self‐efficacy and well‐being when teaching out‐of‐field; out‐of‐field teachers use narrower subject skills, safety, and knowledge. Professional learning, skill development, resource provision, support/mentoring, planning time, and strategic hiring are suggested to address out‐of‐field teaching challenges.

Family and Consumer Sciences Research JournalVol. 53(3)
Griffith University (AU), Central Queensland University (AU), University of New England (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Diverse Education Studies and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.