Socio-environmental modeling shows physics-like confidence with water modeling surpassing it in numerical claims

Several modern scientific fields rely on computationally intensive mathematical models to study uncertain, complex socio-environmental phenomena such as the spread of a virus, climate change, or the water cycle. However, the degree of epistemic commitment of these fields is unclear. By using machine learning to extract the knowledge claims of around 755,000 abstracts from 14 scientific fields spanning the human and physical sciences, we show that epidemic, integrated assessment, and water modeling display a degree of linguistic assertiveness akin to physics. Water modeling surpasses even the most accurate physical sciences in substantiating knowledge claims with numbers, which are largely produced without accompanying uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. By exploring the balance between doubt and certainty in academic writing, our study reflects on whether the strong conviction and quantification of fields modeling socio-environmental processes, especially water modeling, are epistemically justified.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
iScience
Published
2025-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2025.112184
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Environmental Monitoring and Data Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Socio-environmental modeling shows physics-like confidence with water modeling surpassing it in numerical claims

Razi Sheikholeslami, Abdolrasoul Sobhani, Arnald Puy, Lieke Anna Melsen et al.
3 citations
iScience
Environmental Monitoring and Data Management
7.04
article

Socio-environmental modeling shows physics-like confidence with water modeling surpassing it in numerical claims

Razi Sheikholeslami, Abdolrasoul Sobhani, Arnald Puy, Lieke Anna Melsen, E. M. Murray, Andrea Saltelli, M. Sadegh Khanjani, Samuele Lo Piano, Nanxin Wei, Adrián Carmona, Kai R. Larsen, Alessio Lachi, David Gefen, Ethan Bacon, Samuel Flinders, Seth N Linga
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Several modern scientific fields rely on computationally intensive mathematical models to study uncertain, complex socio-environmental phenomena such as the spread of a virus, climate change, or the water cycle. However, the degree of epistemic commitment of these fields is unclear. By using machine learning to extract the knowledge claims of around 755,000 abstracts from 14 scientific fields spanning the human and physical sciences, we show that epidemic, integrated assessment, and water modeling display a degree of linguistic assertiveness akin to physics. Water modeling surpasses even the most accurate physical sciences in substantiating knowledge claims with numbers, which are largely produced without accompanying uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. By exploring the balance between doubt and certainty in academic writing, our study reflects on whether the strong conviction and quantification of fields modeling socio-environmental processes, especially water modeling, are epistemically justified.

iScienceVol. 28(4)
University of Leeds (GB), Sharif University of Technology (IR), Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES), University of Colorado Boulder (US), Saint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences (IT), University of Bergen (NO), University of Reading (GB), Drexel University (US), University of Birmingham (GB), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Government of the United Kingdom, UK Research and Innovation, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Environmental Monitoring and Data Management
7.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.