The correlation of Financial Action Task Force recommendations: the perception of compliance officers concerning the deployment of third parties and Fintech for customer due diligence

Purpose This study aims to explore the challenges financial institutions face in deploying third parties and financial technologies to perform customer due diligence. Design/methodology/approach This study applied a qualitative technique and interviewed 25 compliance officers from different financial institutes and their regulators. Findings This study found that the third-party recommendation of the Financial Action Task Force is restrictive, contradictory, time-consuming and seriously lacks standardisation. Furthermore, this recommendation restricts the use of modern Fintechs. This recommendation has posed significant challenges for the adoption of Fintechs, international banking/onboarding, digital onboarding and financial inclusion. Practical implications Thus, revisiting the Financial Action Task Force Recommendations 17 and 15 in correlation with Recommendation 10 is suggested. Originality/value The Recommendation 17 is rarely discussed in details, especially in developing courtiers’ context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Money Laundering Control
Published
2025-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jmlc-08-2024-0135
Citations
1
Primary Topic
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The correlation of Financial Action Task Force recommendations: the perception of compliance officers concerning the deployment of third parties and Fintech for customer due diligence

Norazida Mohamed, Akhbar Satar, David Chisunga, Nasir Sultan
1 citations
Journal of Money Laundering Control
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
2.28
article

The correlation of Financial Action Task Force recommendations: the perception of compliance officers concerning the deployment of third parties and Fintech for customer due diligence

Norazida Mohamed, Akhbar Satar, David Chisunga, Nasir Sultan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to explore the challenges financial institutions face in deploying third parties and financial technologies to perform customer due diligence. Design/methodology/approach This study applied a qualitative technique and interviewed 25 compliance officers from different financial institutes and their regulators. Findings This study found that the third-party recommendation of the Financial Action Task Force is restrictive, contradictory, time-consuming and seriously lacks standardisation. Furthermore, this recommendation restricts the use of modern Fintechs. This recommendation has posed significant challenges for the adoption of Fintechs, international banking/onboarding, digital onboarding and financial inclusion. Practical implications Thus, revisiting the Financial Action Task Force Recommendations 17 and 15 in correlation with Recommendation 10 is suggested. Originality/value The Recommendation 17 is rarely discussed in details, especially in developing courtiers’ context.

Journal of Money Laundering ControlVol. 28(2)
HELP University (MY), Harare Institute of Technology (ZW), Universiti Teknologi MARA (MY), University of Gujrat (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
2.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.