Low-flow Low-gradient Aortic Stenosis: Foundations, Challenges, and Solutions

Abstract Purpose of Review This review aims to provide a comprehensive update to healthcare providers on the assessment and subsequent management of low-flow aortic stenosis. Recent Findings An aging population with a greater burden of cardiovascular risk factors has contributed to an increasing prevalence of aortic stenosis. The classification of the discordant low-flow cohort of aortic stenosis remains difficult and sub-optimal in the face of a heterogeneous disease population. Recent research has investigated use of echocardiographic flow parameters to categorise and prognosticate the low-flow aortic stenosis cohort. There is an increased awareness of the overlap between cardiac amyloidosis and the low-flow aortic stenosis group which has treatment implications. TAVI holds promise as a safer alternative to SAVR in this multimorbid, high-risk patient cohort. Summary Assessment and management of the low-flow aortic stenosis group needs to be highly individualised according to phenotype and comorbidities. This is best managed within the multidisciplinary Heart Team approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine
Published
2025-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-025-01082-6
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Low-flow Low-gradient Aortic Stenosis: Foundations, Challenges, and Solutions

Mayooran Namasivayam, Michael P. Feneley, Thomas Meredith, David Cardona Müller et al.
1 citations
Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
1.39
article

Low-flow Low-gradient Aortic Stenosis: Foundations, Challenges, and Solutions

Mayooran Namasivayam, Michael P. Feneley, Thomas Meredith, David Cardona Müller, C. Hayward, L Weir
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Purpose of Review This review aims to provide a comprehensive update to healthcare providers on the assessment and subsequent management of low-flow aortic stenosis. Recent Findings An aging population with a greater burden of cardiovascular risk factors has contributed to an increasing prevalence of aortic stenosis. The classification of the discordant low-flow cohort of aortic stenosis remains difficult and sub-optimal in the face of a heterogeneous disease population. Recent research has investigated use of echocardiographic flow parameters to categorise and prognosticate the low-flow aortic stenosis cohort. There is an increased awareness of the overlap between cardiac amyloidosis and the low-flow aortic stenosis group which has treatment implications. TAVI holds promise as a safer alternative to SAVR in this multimorbid, high-risk patient cohort. Summary Assessment and management of the low-flow aortic stenosis group needs to be highly individualised according to phenotype and comorbidities. This is best managed within the multidisciplinary Heart Team approach.

Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular MedicineVol. 27(1)
St Vincent's Hospital Sydney (AU)
University of New South Wales
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Low-flow Low-gradient Aortic Stenosis: Foundations, Challenges, and Solutions — Mayooran Namasivayam, Michael P. Feneley, et al. · Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS