Uncertainty in CFD simulation of reactors and approaches to improve the confidence of simulation results

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) plays an important role in the design and optimization of reactor thermal-hydraulic systems and serves as an essential component of the ”virtual reactor” projects globally. However, the credibility of CFD simulations is often questioned due to various sources of error and uncertainty, limiting their broader applications in engineering practice. A rigorous process of Verification, Validation, and Uncertainty Quantification (V&V&UQ) is widely acknowledged as essential for assessing the credibility of CFD simulation results. Nevertheless, existing guidelines and standards remain largely theoretical, lacking practical implementation strategies, which prevents a comprehensive understanding of V&V&UQ among researchers. With the enhancement of computational resources, there is potential to improve the credibility of CFD simulation of reactors by reducing the introduction of errors and uncertainties while enhancing V&V&UQ tools and data accessibility. This paper identifies key sources of error and uncertainty across different stages of CFD simulation of reactors from a software developer’s perspective. Furthermore, it explores approaches to improve the credibility of CFD simulation of reactors, emphasizing four critical areas: minimizing model uncertainty, reducing numerical uncertainty, establishing a robust mesh quality evaluation framework, and advancing supportive tools and datasets. By clarifying sources of error and uncertainty and providing guidance for future developments, this paper aims to contribute to the enhanced credibility of CFD simulation of reactors in the future. • Reviews the research on V&V&UQ in reactor CFD simulations. • Identifies key sources of error and uncertainty in reactor CFD simulations. • Explores approaches to improve the credibility of reactor CFD simulations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Nuclear Engineering and Design
Published
2025-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2025.113974
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Nuclear Engineering Thermal-Hydraulics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.99

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncertainty in CFD simulation of reactors and approaches to improve the confidence of simulation results

Genshen Chu, W P Jia, Yang Li, Dandan Chen et al.
1 citations
Nuclear Engineering and Design
Nuclear Engineering Thermal-Hydraulics
4.99
article

Uncertainty in CFD simulation of reactors and approaches to improve the confidence of simulation results

Genshen Chu, W P Jia, Yang Li, Dandan Chen, Lingyu Dong, Xu Lu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) plays an important role in the design and optimization of reactor thermal-hydraulic systems and serves as an essential component of the ”virtual reactor” projects globally. However, the credibility of CFD simulations is often questioned due to various sources of error and uncertainty, limiting their broader applications in engineering practice. A rigorous process of Verification, Validation, and Uncertainty Quantification (V&V&UQ) is widely acknowledged as essential for assessing the credibility of CFD simulation results. Nevertheless, existing guidelines and standards remain largely theoretical, lacking practical implementation strategies, which prevents a comprehensive understanding of V&V&UQ among researchers. With the enhancement of computational resources, there is potential to improve the credibility of CFD simulation of reactors by reducing the introduction of errors and uncertainties while enhancing V&V&UQ tools and data accessibility. This paper identifies key sources of error and uncertainty across different stages of CFD simulation of reactors from a software developer’s perspective. Furthermore, it explores approaches to improve the credibility of CFD simulation of reactors, emphasizing four critical areas: minimizing model uncertainty, reducing numerical uncertainty, establishing a robust mesh quality evaluation framework, and advancing supportive tools and datasets. By clarifying sources of error and uncertainty and providing guidance for future developments, this paper aims to contribute to the enhanced credibility of CFD simulation of reactors in the future. • Reviews the research on V&V&UQ in reactor CFD simulations. • Identifies key sources of error and uncertainty in reactor CFD simulations. • Explores approaches to improve the credibility of reactor CFD simulations.

Nuclear Engineering and DesignVol. 436
National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Nuclear Engineering Thermal-Hydraulics
4.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.