Toward the enhancement of affective brain–computer interfaces using dependence within EEG series

In recent years, electroencephalogram (EEG)-based affective brain-computer interfaces (aBCI) has made remarkable advances.<i>Objective</i>. However, a subtle but crucial problem caused by the sliding window method has long been overlooked, which is the serious quantity mismatch between stimuli and short-term EEG frames. This may be an important factor limiting the performance of aBCIs.<i>Approach</i>. We refer to this mismatch as the quantity-independence imbalance (Q/I imbalance) and we propose the weak independence hypothesis to explain the mismatch. To validate this hypothesis and explore the effects of the Q/I imbalance on short-term EEG frames, we design four experiments from four perspectives, which are visualization, cross-validation, randomness test, and redundancy test.<i>Main results</i>. Inspired by validation experiments, we propose an inference correction (IC) method to enhancing the emotional predictions by leveraging the majority of the classifier's outputs. The proposed IC method is evaluated on two datasets involving 60 subjects using both intra-subject and inter-subject validation protocols. Our IC achieves a significant improvement of 14.97% in classification accuracy.<i>Significance</i>. This study promotes the understanding of the time-dependent nature of EEG signals in aBCI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2025-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/adbfc0
Citations
29
Primary Topic
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
41.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward the enhancement of affective brain–computer interfaces using dependence within EEG series

Zhiguo Luo, Liang Xie, Chuang Ma, Bowen Ji et al.
29 citations
Journal of Neural Engineering
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
41.50
article

Toward the enhancement of affective brain–computer interfaces using dependence within EEG series

Zhiguo Luo, Liang Xie, Chuang Ma, Bowen Ji, Tingyu Sheng, Shaokai Zhao, Erwei Yin, Kun Gao, Xiaomin Wang, Ye Yan, Yu Pei
article en
29 citations

Abstract

In recent years, electroencephalogram (EEG)-based affective brain-computer interfaces (aBCI) has made remarkable advances.<i>Objective</i>. However, a subtle but crucial problem caused by the sliding window method has long been overlooked, which is the serious quantity mismatch between stimuli and short-term EEG frames. This may be an important factor limiting the performance of aBCIs.<i>Approach</i>. We refer to this mismatch as the quantity-independence imbalance (Q/I imbalance) and we propose the weak independence hypothesis to explain the mismatch. To validate this hypothesis and explore the effects of the Q/I imbalance on short-term EEG frames, we design four experiments from four perspectives, which are visualization, cross-validation, randomness test, and redundancy test.<i>Main results</i>. Inspired by validation experiments, we propose an inference correction (IC) method to enhancing the emotional predictions by leveraging the majority of the classifier's outputs. The proposed IC method is evaluated on two datasets involving 60 subjects using both intra-subject and inter-subject validation protocols. Our IC achieves a significant improvement of 14.97% in classification accuracy.<i>Significance</i>. This study promotes the understanding of the time-dependent nature of EEG signals in aBCI.

Journal of Neural EngineeringVol. 22(2)
Tianjin University (CN), Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN), Peking University (CN), Academy of Military Medical Sciences (CN), PLA Academy of Military Science (CN), Tianjin Medical University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
41.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.