Semiautomated Production of Cell-Free Biosensors

Cell-free synthetic biology biosensors have potential as effective <i>in vitro</i> diagnostic technologies for the detection of chemical compounds, such as toxins and human health biomarkers. They have several advantages over conventional laboratory-based diagnostic approaches, including the ability to be assembled, freeze-dried, distributed, and then used at the point of need. This makes them an attractive platform for cheap and rapid chemical detection across the globe. Though promising, a major challenge is scaling up biosensor manufacturing to meet the needs of their multiple uses. Currently, cell-free biosensor assembly during lab-scale development is mostly performed manually by the operator, leading to quality control and performance variability issues. Here we explore the use of liquid-handling robotics to manufacture cell-free biosensor reactions. We compare both manual and semiautomated reaction assembly approaches using the Opentrons OT-2 liquid handling platform on two different cell-free gene expression assay systems that constitutively produce colorimetric (LacZ) or fluorescent (GFP) signals. We test the designed protocol by constructing an entire 384-well plate of fluoride-sensing cell-free biosensors and demonstrate that they perform close to expected detection outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Synthetic Biology
Published
2025-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.4c00703
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.74

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Semiautomated Production of Cell-Free Biosensors

Nathan D. McDonald, David C. Garcia, Marilyn F. Slininger Lee, Matthew W. Lux et al.
10 citations
ACS Synthetic Biology
Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
6.74
article

Semiautomated Production of Cell-Free Biosensors

Nathan D. McDonald, David C. Garcia, Marilyn F. Slininger Lee, Matthew W. Lux, Katherine A. Rhea, Aníbal Arce, Aleksandr E. Miklos, Casey B. Bernhards, Daniel A. Phillips, Stephanie D. Cole, Julius B. Lucks, Brenda Wang, Walter Thavarajah, Michael C. Jewett, Xavier Bower, Steven M. Blum, Ashty S. Karim, John R. Biondo, Tyler Lucci, Jennifer A. Lee, Dylan M. Brown, John P. Davies, Dale L. Perdue, Jacob T. Mangini
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Cell-free synthetic biology biosensors have potential as effective <i>in vitro</i> diagnostic technologies for the detection of chemical compounds, such as toxins and human health biomarkers. They have several advantages over conventional laboratory-based diagnostic approaches, including the ability to be assembled, freeze-dried, distributed, and then used at the point of need. This makes them an attractive platform for cheap and rapid chemical detection across the globe. Though promising, a major challenge is scaling up biosensor manufacturing to meet the needs of their multiple uses. Currently, cell-free biosensor assembly during lab-scale development is mostly performed manually by the operator, leading to quality control and performance variability issues. Here we explore the use of liquid-handling robotics to manufacture cell-free biosensor reactions. We compare both manual and semiautomated reaction assembly approaches using the Opentrons OT-2 liquid handling platform on two different cell-free gene expression assay systems that constitutively produce colorimetric (LacZ) or fluorescent (GFP) signals. We test the designed protocol by constructing an entire 384-well plate of fluoride-sensing cell-free biosensors and demonstrate that they perform close to expected detection outcomes.

ACS Synthetic BiologyVol. 14(3)
Northwestern University (US), United States Department of the Army (US), Defense Threat Reduction Agency (US), United States Army Combat Capabilities Development Command (US), United States Army (US), Compass Systems (United States) (US), Precise (India) (IN), Synthetic Biologics (United States) (US), U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Chemical Biological Center, University of Maryland, College Park (US), Stanford University (US)
National Science Foundation, John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
6.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.