Scientific review of protocols to enhance informativeness of global health clinical trials
This study provides a taxonomy of scientific review feedback topic areas that can be used to categorize clinical trial design topics. The high number of recommendations per protocol review across several distinct topic areas highlights the need for a scientific review to enhance trial informativeness. This review must take place prior to trial initiation and review teams should include statistical and trial design expertise with additional expertise tailored to the trial/intervention type and phase.
Authors
- Trevor R. Norman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2903-7096)
- Shawn Dolley (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1266-1722)
- Bryan Burford (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4687-7556)
Institutions
- Gates Foundation (US)
- Open Geospatial Consortium (US)
- National Coalition of Independent Scholars (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Trials
- Published
- 2025-03-12
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-08763-4
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Ethics in Clinical Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.76
Funders
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation