Why disentanglement-based speaker anonymization systems fail at preserving emotions?

Disentanglement-based speaker anonymization involves decomposing speech into a semantically meaningful representation, altering the speaker embedding, and resynthesizing a waveform using a neural vocoder. State-of-the-art systems of this kind are known to remove emotion information. Possible reasons include mode collapse in GAN-based vocoders, unintended modeling and modification of emotions through speaker embeddings, or excessive sanitization of the intermediate representation (IR). In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation of a state-of-the-art speaker anonymization system to understand the underlying causes. We conclude that the main reason is the lack of emotion-related information in the IR. The speaker embeddings also have a high impact, if they are learned in a generative context. The vocoder’s out-of-distribution performance has a smaller impact. Additionally, we discovered that synthesis artifacts increase spectral kurtosis, biasing emotion recognition evaluation towards classifying utterances as angry. Therefore, we conclude that reporting unweighted average recall alone for emotion recognition performance is suboptimal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icassp49660.2025.10889709
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Speech Recognition and Synthesis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why disentanglement-based speaker anonymization systems fail at preserving emotions?

Ünal Ege Gaznepoglu, Nils Peters
1 citations
Speech Recognition and Synthesis
2.48
article

Why disentanglement-based speaker anonymization systems fail at preserving emotions?

Ünal Ege Gaznepoglu, Nils Peters
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Disentanglement-based speaker anonymization involves decomposing speech into a semantically meaningful representation, altering the speaker embedding, and resynthesizing a waveform using a neural vocoder. State-of-the-art systems of this kind are known to remove emotion information. Possible reasons include mode collapse in GAN-based vocoders, unintended modeling and modification of emotions through speaker embeddings, or excessive sanitization of the intermediate representation (IR). In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation of a state-of-the-art speaker anonymization system to understand the underlying causes. We conclude that the main reason is the lack of emotion-related information in the IR. The speaker embeddings also have a high impact, if they are learned in a generative context. The vocoder’s out-of-distribution performance has a smaller impact. Additionally, we discovered that synthesis artifacts increase spectral kurtosis, biasing emotion recognition evaluation towards classifying utterances as angry. Therefore, we conclude that reporting unweighted average recall alone for emotion recognition performance is suboptimal.

Trinity College Dublin (IE), International Audio Laboratories Erlangen (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Speech Recognition and Synthesis
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.