BIGFR: Bridging Individual and Group Fairness in Recommendation Systems

Recommendation systems enhance user experience and retention by offering personalized content. As they increasingly influence social resource allocation (e.g., job recommendations), ensuring fair recommendations is becoming essential. Fairness notions in recommendation systems are mainly divided into individual and group fairness, and existing researchers notice the necessity of achieving both of them. However, the research indicates that there exists a trade-off relationship between them due to the way of defining individual fairness. Hence, existing methods attempt to redefine individual fairness. Unfortunately, they overlook the similarity comparison, which is essential for individual fairness. To address this issue, we redefine individual fairness from a ranking perspective. Based on this, we propose a framework that enhances both individual and group fairness. This framework includes a group fairness module, an individual fairness module, and a utility module. Extensive experiments show that our framework achieves a good balance between group fairness, individual fairness, and utility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icassp49660.2025.10888260
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Recommender Systems and Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

BIGFR: Bridging Individual and Group Fairness in Recommendation Systems

Xuemin Wang, Yong Gan, Liang Chang, Tieyuan Liu et al.
1 citations
Recommender Systems and Techniques
3.25
article

BIGFR: Bridging Individual and Group Fairness in Recommendation Systems

Xuemin Wang, Yong Gan, Liang Chang, Tieyuan Liu, Yu Zeng, Qicang Gen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Recommendation systems enhance user experience and retention by offering personalized content. As they increasingly influence social resource allocation (e.g., job recommendations), ensuring fair recommendations is becoming essential. Fairness notions in recommendation systems are mainly divided into individual and group fairness, and existing researchers notice the necessity of achieving both of them. However, the research indicates that there exists a trade-off relationship between them due to the way of defining individual fairness. Hence, existing methods attempt to redefine individual fairness. Unfortunately, they overlook the similarity comparison, which is essential for individual fairness. To address this issue, we redefine individual fairness from a ranking perspective. Based on this, we propose a framework that enhances both individual and group fairness. This framework includes a group fairness module, an individual fairness module, and a utility module. Extensive experiments show that our framework achieves a good balance between group fairness, individual fairness, and utility.

Guilin University of Electronic Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Recommender Systems and Techniques
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.