Environmental variables controlling soil aggregate stability across spatial scales and locations in a karst region of southwestern China

• Scale- and location-specific variations in SAS were unraveled. • Topography was the primary factor controlling SAS variation at small scale. • Soil properties and precipitation dominated SAS variation at medium and large scales. • The relationship between SAS and key factors was location-specific across all scales. Information on soil aggregate stability (SAS) is essential for assessing ecosystem services and scaling up soil erosion models. The global contributions of environmental factors (e.g., soil properties, topography, and climate) on SAS at a specific spatial scale are extensively documented. However, the scale- and location-specific controls of these factors are poorly understood. Here, using 2,238 topsoil (0–0.2 m) samples and 24 environmental factors, we quantified SAS variability across different spatial scales and locations in a karst region (43,700 km 2 ) of southwestern China. We found SAS varied mainly at large scale (20 km) followed by medium scale (10 km) and small scale (2 km). Topographic variables, namely, slope, elevation, and plan curvature were key determinants of controlling SAS variability at small scale. Soil organic matter and precipitation were critical drivers affecting SAS variability at medium scale. Precipitation and cation exchange capacity were main factors controlling SAS variability at large scale. Specifically, slope primarily exhibited a negative influence on small-scale SAS variability in the southern region, and a positive effect in the northern region. At medium scale, soil organic matter generally exerted positive effects on SAS. At large scale, the primary influence of precipitation typically differs between the northernmost part and remaining region of the study area. These results reveal the scale- and location-specific controls of environmental factors on SAS that should be considered for digital soil mapping and designing region-based soil management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoderma
Published
2025-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117240
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Karst Systems and Hydrogeology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental variables controlling soil aggregate stability across spatial scales and locations in a karst region of southwestern China

Weichun Zhang, Wei Wu, Jiangwen Li, Hongbin Liu et al.
4 citations
Geoderma
Karst Systems and Hydrogeology
6.68
article

Environmental variables controlling soil aggregate stability across spatial scales and locations in a karst region of southwestern China

Weichun Zhang, Wei Wu, Jiangwen Li, Hongbin Liu, Xin Zhang
article en
4 citations

Abstract

• Scale- and location-specific variations in SAS were unraveled. • Topography was the primary factor controlling SAS variation at small scale. • Soil properties and precipitation dominated SAS variation at medium and large scales. • The relationship between SAS and key factors was location-specific across all scales. Information on soil aggregate stability (SAS) is essential for assessing ecosystem services and scaling up soil erosion models. The global contributions of environmental factors (e.g., soil properties, topography, and climate) on SAS at a specific spatial scale are extensively documented. However, the scale- and location-specific controls of these factors are poorly understood. Here, using 2,238 topsoil (0–0.2 m) samples and 24 environmental factors, we quantified SAS variability across different spatial scales and locations in a karst region (43,700 km 2 ) of southwestern China. We found SAS varied mainly at large scale (20 km) followed by medium scale (10 km) and small scale (2 km). Topographic variables, namely, slope, elevation, and plan curvature were key determinants of controlling SAS variability at small scale. Soil organic matter and precipitation were critical drivers affecting SAS variability at medium scale. Precipitation and cation exchange capacity were main factors controlling SAS variability at large scale. Specifically, slope primarily exhibited a negative influence on small-scale SAS variability in the southern region, and a positive effect in the northern region. At medium scale, soil organic matter generally exerted positive effects on SAS. At large scale, the primary influence of precipitation typically differs between the northernmost part and remaining region of the study area. These results reveal the scale- and location-specific controls of environmental factors on SAS that should be considered for digital soil mapping and designing region-based soil management.

GeodermaVol. 456
Southwest University (CN), Northwest A&F University (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Karst Systems and Hydrogeology
6.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.