Updates and evaluation of NOAA's online-coupled air quality model version 7 (AQMv7) within the Unified Forecast System

Abstract. The air quality forecasting system is an essential tool widely used by environmental managers to mitigate adverse health effects of air pollutants. This work presents the latest development of the next-generation regional air quality model (AQM) forecast system within the Unified Forecast System (UFS) framework in the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The UFS air quality model incorporates the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model as its main chemistry component. In this system, CMAQ is integrated as a column model to solve gas and aerosol chemistry, while the transport of chemical species is processed by UFS. The current AQM version 7 (AQMv7) is coupled with an earlier version of CMAQ (version 5.2.1). Here we describe the development of the updated AQMv7 by coupling to a “state-of-the-science” CMAQ version 5.4. The updates include improvements in gas and aerosol chemistry, dry deposition processes, and structural changes to the input/output (I/O) interface, enhancing both computational efficiency and representation of air–surface exchange processes. A simulation was conducted for the period of June–August 2023 to assess the effects of these updates on the forecast performance of ozone (O3) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5), two major air pollutants over the continental United States (CONUS). The results show that the updated model demonstrates an enhanced capability in simulating O3 over the CONUS by reducing the positive bias, leading to a reduction in the mean bias by 3 %–5 % and 8 %–12 % for hourly and the maximum daily 8 h average O3, respectively. Spatially, the updated model lowers the positive bias of hourly O3 in most of the 10 EPA regions, particularly within the central and northwest areas, while amplifying the O3 underestimation over the sites with negative bias. Similarly, the updates induce uniformly lower fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentrations across the CONUS domain, reducing the positive bias at some sites over the northeast in August and central Great Plains. The updated model does not improve model performance for PM2.5 in the vicinity and downwind of fire emission sources, where AQMv7 shows the highest negative bias, thus indicating a focal point of model uncertainty and needed improvement. Despite these challenges, the study highlights the importance of the ongoing refinements for reliable air quality predictions from the UFS-AQM model, which is a planned future update to NOAA's current operational air quality forecast system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoscientific model development
Published
2025-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1635-2025
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Updates and evaluation of NOAA's online-coupled air quality model version 7 (AQMv7) within the Unified Forecast System

Kai Wang, Daniel Tong, Youhua Tang, Barry Baker et al.
2 citations
Geoscientific model development
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
2.60
article

Updates and evaluation of NOAA's online-coupled air quality model version 7 (AQMv7) within the Unified Forecast System

Kai Wang, Daniel Tong, Youhua Tang, Barry Baker, Raffaele Montuoro, Ivanka Štajner, Jianping Huang, Beiming Tang, Patrick Campbell, Zachary Moon, Wei Li
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract. The air quality forecasting system is an essential tool widely used by environmental managers to mitigate adverse health effects of air pollutants. This work presents the latest development of the next-generation regional air quality model (AQM) forecast system within the Unified Forecast System (UFS) framework in the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The UFS air quality model incorporates the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model as its main chemistry component. In this system, CMAQ is integrated as a column model to solve gas and aerosol chemistry, while the transport of chemical species is processed by UFS. The current AQM version 7 (AQMv7) is coupled with an earlier version of CMAQ (version 5.2.1). Here we describe the development of the updated AQMv7 by coupling to a “state-of-the-science” CMAQ version 5.4. The updates include improvements in gas and aerosol chemistry, dry deposition processes, and structural changes to the input/output (I/O) interface, enhancing both computational efficiency and representation of air–surface exchange processes. A simulation was conducted for the period of June–August 2023 to assess the effects of these updates on the forecast performance of ozone (O3) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5), two major air pollutants over the continental United States (CONUS). The results show that the updated model demonstrates an enhanced capability in simulating O3 over the CONUS by reducing the positive bias, leading to a reduction in the mean bias by 3 %–5 % and 8 %–12 % for hourly and the maximum daily 8 h average O3, respectively. Spatially, the updated model lowers the positive bias of hourly O3 in most of the 10 EPA regions, particularly within the central and northwest areas, while amplifying the O3 underestimation over the sites with negative bias. Similarly, the updates induce uniformly lower fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentrations across the CONUS domain, reducing the positive bias at some sites over the northeast in August and central Great Plains. The updated model does not improve model performance for PM2.5 in the vicinity and downwind of fire emission sources, where AQMv7 shows the highest negative bias, thus indicating a focal point of model uncertainty and needed improvement. Despite these challenges, the study highlights the importance of the ongoing refinements for reliable air quality predictions from the UFS-AQM model, which is a planned future update to NOAA's current operational air quality forecast system.

Geoscientific model developmentVol. 18(5)
George Mason University (US), Earth Resources Technology (United States) (US), Global Science & Technology (United States) (US), NOAA Environmental Modeling Center, NOAA Air Resources Laboratory (US)
George Mason University, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
2.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.