Multimodal neuromonitoring in the nordic countries: experiences and attitudes – a multi-institutional survey
There was a remarkable variation in the reported use of aMMM among Nordic neurosurgical centers, indicating an extensive lack of consensus on need and utility. Surprisingly routine use of TCD was stated by 75%, presumably for routine monitoring of SAH patients, whereas CMD was mostly considered a research tool. Interestingly, junior staff and appointed experts disagreed on intended local routines, indicating that application of aMMM was more governed organically and by case than on explicit guidelines or that uniform management was not prioritized.
Authors
- Tiit Illimar Mathiesen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9463-1919)
- Anne‐Mette Magnussen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9386-9340)
- Markus Harboe Olsen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0981-0723)
- Axel Forsse (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0325-0262)
- Carsten Reidies Bjarkam (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0164-9595)
- Anders Rosendal Korshoej (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4285-8171)
Institutions
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Aarhus University (DK)
- Aalborg University Hospital (DK)
- Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
- Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
- Rigshospitalet (DK)
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Acta Neurochirurgica
- Published
- 2025-03-12
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-025-06479-7
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.39
Funders
- Københavns Universitet