When does discursive change happen? Detecting phase transitions in discourse networks of sustainability transitions

Sustainability Transitions Research (STR) confronts complex societal challenges by examining societal shifts and their trajectories. An emerging perspective in STR is discursive approaches, which analyse the role of discourses and discourse coalitions in shaping sustainability transitions. However, discursive approaches face challenges regarding the analysis of sustainability transition processes as complex, temporal processes of stability and change. We discuss the nature of these challenges and extend the method of discourse network analysis (DNA) by measuring distinct temporal states (phases of stability) in discourse networks and detecting phase transitions (significant changes) between these discursive states. Whereas most approaches analyse discursive changes in a top-down way, we introduce a method for the bottom-up detection of discursive stability and change. This facilitates a more accurate tracing of how sustainability transitions unfold over time. An empirical application of this extension to the discursive networks around the introduction of a Low Emission Zone demonstrates how and when discourses and actors display significant structural shifts. This methodological innovation addresses the need for measuring stability and change in the complex, discursive, temporal dynamics of sustainability transitions. • Identification of 3 challenges of discursive approaches to energy transitions. • Discourse Network Analysis is extended by drawing on mathematical network science. • Bottom-up detection of temporal phases, states, transitions in discourse networks. • Energy transitions should be analysed through the lens of temporal networks. • Case study on the changing debate on a low emission zone in Ghent, Belgium.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Research & Social Science
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104020
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When does discursive change happen? Detecting phase transitions in discourse networks of sustainability transitions

Philip Leifeld, Kimberley Vandenhole, Kristijan Garic
3 citations
Energy Research & Social Science
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
3.32
article

When does discursive change happen? Detecting phase transitions in discourse networks of sustainability transitions

Philip Leifeld, Kimberley Vandenhole, Kristijan Garic
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Sustainability Transitions Research (STR) confronts complex societal challenges by examining societal shifts and their trajectories. An emerging perspective in STR is discursive approaches, which analyse the role of discourses and discourse coalitions in shaping sustainability transitions. However, discursive approaches face challenges regarding the analysis of sustainability transition processes as complex, temporal processes of stability and change. We discuss the nature of these challenges and extend the method of discourse network analysis (DNA) by measuring distinct temporal states (phases of stability) in discourse networks and detecting phase transitions (significant changes) between these discursive states. Whereas most approaches analyse discursive changes in a top-down way, we introduce a method for the bottom-up detection of discursive stability and change. This facilitates a more accurate tracing of how sustainability transitions unfold over time. An empirical application of this extension to the discursive networks around the introduction of a Low Emission Zone demonstrates how and when discourses and actors display significant structural shifts. This methodological innovation addresses the need for measuring stability and change in the complex, discursive, temporal dynamics of sustainability transitions. • Identification of 3 challenges of discursive approaches to energy transitions. • Discourse Network Analysis is extended by drawing on mathematical network science. • Bottom-up detection of temporal phases, states, transitions in discourse networks. • Energy transitions should be analysed through the lens of temporal networks. • Case study on the changing debate on a low emission zone in Ghent, Belgium.

Energy Research & Social ScienceVol. 122
University of Essex (GB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE), University of Manchester (GB), Ghent University (BE), Institute for Social and Economic Research (GB)
Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS, Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
3.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.