Towards a ‘Development Humanities’: widening the multi-disciplinary field of development studies

This paper proposes a new sub-field of Development Humanities (DH) that aims to extend the multidisciplinary base of Development Studies (DS) via a distinctive set of themes, analytical tools and data sources. This would contribute further to ‘epistemological pluralism’, while equipping DS with additional tools to engage with today’s urgent and complex issues. These include subjective aspects of how ‘development’ is experienced, imagining better development futures, and finding new ways to communicate ideas. Aiming for ‘radical interdisciplinarity’, DH would seek to critically challenge mainstream ideas and encourage the co-production of new research questions, as well as building new pedagogies and equipping practitioners with useful skills. Comparable fields such as Environmental Humanities and Medical Humanities offer potentially useful lessons, as well as highlighting possible risks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oxford Development Studies
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2025.2476553
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards a ‘Development Humanities’: widening the multi-disciplinary field of development studies

David Lewis
2 citations
Oxford Development Studies
Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development
11.18
article

Towards a ‘Development Humanities’: widening the multi-disciplinary field of development studies

David Lewis
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper proposes a new sub-field of Development Humanities (DH) that aims to extend the multidisciplinary base of Development Studies (DS) via a distinctive set of themes, analytical tools and data sources. This would contribute further to ‘epistemological pluralism’, while equipping DS with additional tools to engage with today’s urgent and complex issues. These include subjective aspects of how ‘development’ is experienced, imagining better development futures, and finding new ways to communicate ideas. Aiming for ‘radical interdisciplinarity’, DH would seek to critically challenge mainstream ideas and encourage the co-production of new research questions, as well as building new pedagogies and equipping practitioners with useful skills. Comparable fields such as Environmental Humanities and Medical Humanities offer potentially useful lessons, as well as highlighting possible risks.

Oxford Development StudiesVol. 53(2)
London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development
11.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.