Lifecycle implications and mechanical properties of carbonated biomass ashes as carbon-storing supplementary cementitious materials

Methods to sequester and store atmospheric CO 2 are critical to combat climate change. Alkaline-rich bioashes are potential carbon fixing materials. This work investigates potential co-benefits from mineralizing carbon in biomass ashes and partially replacing high embodied greenhouse gas (GHG) Portland cement (PC) in cement-based materials with these ashes. Specifically, rice hull ash (RHA), wheat straw ash (WSA), and sugarcane bagasse ash (SBA) were treated to mineralize carbon, and their experimental carbon content was compared to modeled potential carbonation. To understand changes in the cement-based storage materials, mortars made with CO 2 -treated WSA and RHA were experimentally compared to PC-only mortars and mortars made with ashes without prior CO 2 treatment. Life cycle assessment methodology was applied to understand potential reductions in GHG emissions. The modeled carbonation was ∼18 g-CO 2 /kg-RHA and ∼180 g-CO 2 /kg-WSA. Ashes oxidized at 500 °C had the largest measured carbon content (5.4 g-carbon/kg-RHA and 35.3 g-carbon/kg-WSA). This carbon appeared to be predominantly residual from the biomass. Isothermal calorimetry showed RHA-PC pastes had similar heat of hydration to PC-pastes, while WSA-PC pastes exhibited an early (at ∼1.5 min) endothermic dip. Mortars with 5 % and 15 % RHA replacement had 1–12 % higher compressive strength at 28 days than PC-only mortars, and milled WSA mortars with 5 % replacement had 3 % higher strength. A loss in strength was noted for the milled 15 % WSA, the CO 2 -treated 5 %, and the 15 % WSA mortars. Modeled reductions in GHG emissions from CO 2 -treated ashes were, however, marginal (<1 %) relative to the untreated ashes. • Biomass ash can store carbon and partially replace Portland cement in building materials. • Modeled carbonation potential for ashes was 4.9–48.9 g-carbon/kg-ash. • The tested ashes had 0.3–35.3 g-carbon/kg-ash, depending on treatment. • Treated ash led to reduced compressive strengths in Portland cement mortars. • Overall reduction in GHG emissions of mortars were <1 % compared to untreated ashes.