Search as Learning

Search systems are often designed to support simple look-up tasks, such as fact-finding and navigation tasks. However, people increasingly use search engines to complete tasks that require deeper learning. In recent years, the search as learning (SAL) research community has argued that search systems should also be designed to support information-seeking tasks that involve complex learning as an important outcome. This monograph aims to provide a comprehensive review of prior research in search as learning and related areas. Searching to learn can be characterized by specific learning objectives, strategies, and context. Therefore, we begin by reviewing research in education that has aimed at characterizing learning objectives, strategies, and context. Then, we review methods used in prior studies to measure learning during a search session. Here, we discuss two important recommendations for future work: (1) measuring learning retention and (2) measuring a learner’s ability to transfer their new knowledge to a novel scenario. Following this, we discuss studies that have focused on understanding factors that influence learning during search and search behaviors that are predictive of learning. Next, we survey tools that have been developed to support learning during search. Searching for the purpose of learning is often a solitary activity. Research in self-regulated learning (SRL) aims to understand how people monitor and control their own learning. Therefore, we review existing models of SRL, methods to measure engagement with specific SRL processes, and tools to support effective SRL. We conclude by discussing potential areas for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1561/1500000084
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Teaching and Learning Programming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.24
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Search as Learning

Kelsey Urgo, Jaime Arguello
9 citations
Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval
Teaching and Learning Programming
15.24
article

Search as Learning

Kelsey Urgo, Jaime Arguello
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Search systems are often designed to support simple look-up tasks, such as fact-finding and navigation tasks. However, people increasingly use search engines to complete tasks that require deeper learning. In recent years, the search as learning (SAL) research community has argued that search systems should also be designed to support information-seeking tasks that involve complex learning as an important outcome. This monograph aims to provide a comprehensive review of prior research in search as learning and related areas. Searching to learn can be characterized by specific learning objectives, strategies, and context. Therefore, we begin by reviewing research in education that has aimed at characterizing learning objectives, strategies, and context. Then, we review methods used in prior studies to measure learning during a search session. Here, we discuss two important recommendations for future work: (1) measuring learning retention and (2) measuring a learner’s ability to transfer their new knowledge to a novel scenario. Following this, we discuss studies that have focused on understanding factors that influence learning during search and search behaviors that are predictive of learning. Next, we survey tools that have been developed to support learning during search. Searching for the purpose of learning is often a solitary activity. Research in self-regulated learning (SRL) aims to understand how people monitor and control their own learning. Therefore, we review existing models of SRL, methods to measure engagement with specific SRL processes, and tools to support effective SRL. We conclude by discussing potential areas for future research.

Foundations and Trends® in Information RetrievalVol. 19(4)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), University of San Francisco (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Teaching and Learning Programming
15.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.